The Black Death killed 38 million people, it was a terrible illness which spread rapidly.
The Great Schism was in 1054 and the Christian church broke up into two sections, which essentially divided the Church with two popes.
I would say that trade would be "believed to travel to Europe because of this", because it would not really fit anywhere else.
Now, I'm not two sure on the last one but the Hundred Years War was where King Edward the III of England thought that he should be the king of France, so there was a very long battle between the two. I would say the Hundred Years War would be started by division of the heir to the throne of England, and France and Italy did not agree who was to be pope. Since the Hundred Years War had really nothing to do with Italy.
It was known as glasnost
It has been used in Russian to mean "openness and transparency. this policy, aided by perestroika which means restructuring,
<span>
introduced a series of reforms designed to give new freedoms to the
people, including greater freedom of speech. The press also became far
less controlled, and thousands of political prisoners and many
dissidents were released.</span>
Invasions by Barbarian tribes
Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor
Answer:
An emotional appeal is used to sway the emotions of an audience to lead them to support the .... a few examples of “pathos” charged words consist of: strong, powerful, tragic, equality, ..
An emotional appeal is a way of persuasion that's designed to create an emotional reaction. Emotion (also referred to as pathos or suffering in Greek) is one of the three modes of persuasion identified by Aristotle. the other two are trademarks, or logic, and ethos, or authority.
appeal to emotion or argumentative ad passions is a logical fallacy characterized through the manipulation of the recipient's emotions for you to win an argument, particularly in the absence of factual evidence
Explanation:
Answer:
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.
