Answer:
7 to 3 is this answer
Step-by-step explanation:
if you noticed, with all the other ones they all have 3 : 7 in it. So by the process of elimination it's 7 to 3 that is different. I'll tell you why,
3 : 7, that is the ratio we have as an example. That's why it isn't the different one.
3 to 7, you say 3 : 7 as 3 to 7 to it still has the same ratio
3/7, this is how to type the fraction version of the ratio so it makes sense that it is the same one as 3 : 7.
7 to 3, if you haven't noticed yet, all of them has 3 : 7 as a counterpart. They are all the same but this one, this is 7 : 3 or 7 to 3. So with logic, this is the different ratio.
Answer:
As can be seen, there has been a rise in the proportion of the population with HIV positive, from 7.5% to 9.94%.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a national organization sets out to investigate the change in prevalence of HIV since the last census in 2010, ya total of 4,706 participants were interviewed and a total of 468 responses were confirmed to be HIV positive, assuming that the data from the census indicated that the prevalence of HIV in the particular population was 7.5%, to determine if the proportion of the prevalence of HIV has changed (is equal to 7.5%) the following calculation should be performed:
4706 = 100
468 = X
468 x 100/4706 = X
46,800 / 4,706 = X
9.94 = X
Therefore, as can be seen, there has been a rise in the proportion of the population with HIV positive, from 7.5% to 9.94%.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
degree 1 ( linear function
Answer:
1f 2×4 -3׳ 12k is divided by × - 3 the remainder is 21 find the value of k
Answer:
35
Step-by-step explanation:
35 is exactly 152 but since its asking for greater then you're right it is 36.
But since it says '>' it means not equal to so it would be:
x > 35
or
x ≥ 36
