1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
quester [9]
3 years ago
15

When is it not appropriate to send a message via e-mail?

English
1 answer:
klemol [59]3 years ago
4 0
I'd say probably when the person you are contacting prefers communicating via call or text or another form of messaging. For almost anything professional or business related, it would be appropriate and acceptable to email.  
You might be interested in
NEED HELPS ASAP!
swat32
Character vs character
6 0
3 years ago
I NEED HELP RN PLEEEEAAAASSSSEEEE!!!!!!!!!!! I also need explanation!!!!!!! Will give brainliest for right answer w/ explanation
Naily [24]
Good evening ladies and gentleman... because he’s addressing the public about how there ready for what’s to come
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Last night, we saw the movie Jurassic Park 3 at the new cineplex. Which is the subject: we Jurassic Park3 movie Last night
Whitepunk [10]
The subject in this sentence is "We" .
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“Your Brain on Blue” is told in ____ person. third first second limited
Lena [83]

The answer to your question is: second person.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a title of your essay on the top line. (convert into Passive )​
Harrizon [31]

Answer:

A New Constitution and a History of “Democracy”

A glance at the late 18th century U.S. political system reveals that the new Constitution was the law of a highly undemocratic land. The early United States was a society in which entire sections of the population were denied basic human rights, where the institutions of the new government were not derived from egalitarian principles, and where millions of people did not receive adequate political representation. As the overarching political instrument of the era, the Constitution bears responsibility for a society in which the many toiled without representation for the benefit of a powerful few.

Perhaps the most egregious example of the Constitution’s anti-democratic features was its sanction of the widespread practice of slavery. Rather than ending slavery, the Constitution allowed planters and others to hold their fellow human beings as chattel. Not only did the Constitution permit the existing system of slavery to continue, it permitted the Atlantic slave trade to keep “importing” slaves for 20 more years. It counted a slave as three-fifths of a human being; moreover, this provision was inserted not to protect the rights of the enslaved but to boost the electoral power of the slave states. Such a provision was not the only institutional failure of the Constitution.

The arrangement of the new federal government in the Constitution was highly unrepresentative. The president was elected indirectly through the Electoral College, while the Supreme Court was completely appointed. In the remaining branch of government, the upper house, the Senate, provided for each state to have equal representation without regard for how many people lived in the state. By diluting the power of the franchise, the Constitution made a system that was destined to be unrepresentative even more undemocratic. Only the House of Representatives nominally derived its power from the people, and its character was deeply affected by who could and could not vote.

The Constitution allowed states to set norms for who could vote in elections and who could not. In the early United States, that meant that people who did not own sufficient property, enslaved people, and women were denied the vote. A government allegedly founded on the idea of “no taxation without representation” violated this rallying cry of the American Revolution. As a result of the Constitution, a majority of people in the early United States could not vote for their representatives.

Rather than promoting a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” the Constitution sanctioned practices and structured institutions that were unrepresentative. Ordinary people, whether because they were enslaved, because they were women, or because they were working-class people, lived and worked without any real power. Instead, a small minority of wealthy and powerful men ruled over the majority of the population; the source of their power was the undemocratic Constitution of the United States.  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An older model car accelerates from 0 to speed v in 10 seconds. a newer, more powerful sports car accelerates from 0 to 2v in th
    5·1 answer
  • Please help quickly! Will give brainliest!
    8·2 answers
  • Which one is odd and why it is odd<br>great , lovely , important, pride, angry​
    8·2 answers
  • Water is a basic human need, yet not everyone has access to it. Lack of access to clean water is a global health crisis. Today,
    8·1 answer
  • 5. What kind of text requires the same writing and thinking skills as the analytical research report that you'll write for this
    15·1 answer
  • How does the conflict in the Animal Farm excerpt relate
    7·1 answer
  • In 2 sentences explain the connotation and denotation of the words remarkable and peculiar
    6·2 answers
  • The Dreamer
    5·2 answers
  • Paul is writing a poem to submit to a national writing contest.
    11·2 answers
  • Instructions: Write a paragraph on the health benefits of dietary fiber. Synthesize the information in both of these sources (be
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!