Um, which summary?
If you're talking about this;
Read the summary of the section of "The Beginnings of the Maasai," where the volcanic eruption and its results are described.
As a result of a volcanic eruption, Enkai and the cattle were thrown into the sky. Enkai wanted to save his cattle. He grew a tree that bridged the sky and the earth. The cattle walked down the tree to Neiterkob. Neiterkob and the Maasai tribe took over caring for the cattle.
Why does the summary need to be revised?
Then the answer is:
The summary lacks transitions that connect ideas
The response provided considers the appeal to logic, to character, and to emotion in the analysis, as expressed in options A, B, and C and explained below.
<h3>What is a rhetorical appeal?</h3>
A rhetorical appeal is a strategy used in order to convince one's audience of something. There are three possible appeals we can use to persuade our audience:
- Appeal to logic or logos.
- Appeal to character/credibility or ethos.
- Appeal to emotion or pathos.
The sample response provided in the instructions takes all the appeals into consideration when analyzing John Muir's statement. Let's break it down here:
- He appeals to logic by giving evidence about the destruction. - Appeal to logic.
- He seems very credible because he knows about the history of individual trees. - Appeal to character.
- Finally, he makes readers want to save the trees by using strong emotional language throughout. - Appeal to emotion.
Therefore, we can select options A, B, and C as the correct answers for this question.
Learn more about rhetorical appeals here:
brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ1
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A is the only adjective or describing situation; describing how she looked while the others use the adverb cheerfully to describe further the verb that came before it.
