Answer:
2,5 b 1 c 0,5 d -1 e 2,5
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer to your question is 92
−<span>3<span>(<span><span>4a</span>−<span>5b</span></span>)</span></span><span>=<span><span>(<span>−3</span>)</span><span>(<span><span>4a</span>+<span>−<span>5b</span></span></span>)</span></span></span><span>=<span><span><span>(<span>−3</span>)</span><span>(<span>4a</span>)</span></span>+<span><span>(<span>−3</span>)</span><span>(<span>−<span>5b</span></span>)</span></span></span></span><span>=<span><span>−<span>12a</span></span>+<span>15<span>b</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
