They interpreted it so that people are allowed to have weapons even if they're not associated to a militia or the army or the police force and can use them for self defense. The legislation that prohibited people from having weapons or that forced them to keep them unloaded and in pieces was determined to be unconstitutional and people were allowed to have weapons if they wanted to have them.
Answer:
heres my opinion
Explanation:
My personal opinion on the Hammurabi code is that it is unjust. Why I think that is because Hammurabi said his code was meant to protect the weak, but in reality all of the laws were just harsh and unnecessary.
Air attacks, ground attacks, ground troops
:Espionage Act and Sedition Act were those acts that limited the freedom of speech during World War 1.
Explanation:
The Sedition Act was mainly came in interaction on 16 May, 1918. This act banned use of many kinds speech rights that included many forms of speech. It is an part of ammendment of Espionage Act that was made for this sort of work.
During the period of war the jury of the country allowed the government allowed the nation to enforce required restrictions on speech to ignore the condition of ang inner conflict. When the United States entered into the war two legislative laws were passed to control the speech affect inside the nation so that government can skip any possibility of any internal security issues by anti national groups or troupes.
Freedom of speech, religion, freedom of the press, right to a trial by jury, search warrant for property searches.
