The way that Russel Baker humorously use first person point of view in "No Grumption" is : B. to describe the problems of the great depression
He use humor to describe the difficult condition during that time using humor such us when other kids dream of achieving great things when they grow up, he only dream to be a garbage man
Hope this helps
Answer:
They must be at least 30 years of age, and has been a citizen for 9 years.
Explanation:
Answer: According to many historians, the revolution was a success.
Explanation:
The Mexican Revolution was bloody and long-lived, killing over 100,000 lives. The literature states that a successful revolution requires four steps. The first is the state of relations in the world the second condition is a political crisis that paralyzes the country, and the third condition is a widespread peasant revolt. In contrast, the fourth condition is the existence of a dissident political movement.
The fact is that the revolution in Mexico has had all of the above. The Mexican Revolution resulted in the overthrow of the old aristocratic, landowning elite, which also lost its political power. One of the main results of the revolution was the redistribution of land ownership, the Catholic Church was stripped of its political and economic power, and the state became a significant factor in regulating relations in society.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
They did settle in 1620 but they were separatists not puritans.
Correct answer: B) on the basis of the age of sitting judges.
Context/explanation:
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was eager to implement his New Deal programs as an antidote to the Great Depression. However, the US Supreme Court had already ruled that some provisions of the New Deal were unconstitutional, because they took too much power into the hands of the federal government, especially the executive branch of the federal government. So, riding the momentum of his landslide reelection victory in 1936, in February of 1937, FDR proposed a plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges. The plan offered to provide full pay to justices over age 70 who would retire. If the older justices didn't retire, assistant justices (with full voting rights) would be appointed to sit with those existing justices. This was a way FDR hoped to give the court a liberal majority that would side with his programs.
As it turned out, before FDR's proposal came up for a vote in Congress, two of the sitting justices came over to his side of the argument, and the Supreme Court narrowly approved as constitutional both the Social Security Act and the National Labor Relations Act. So his plan (which failed in the US Senate) became unnecessary to his purposes.
Roosevelt's "court-packing" scheme was unpopular. It was seen as an attempt to take away the independence of the judicial branch of government.
