1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iragen [17]
3 years ago
8

Why did Rhode Island refuse to participate in the Philadelphia Convention?

History
1 answer:
kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The state of Rhode Island did not send any delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 because they were afraid of exactly what ended up happening. That is, they were afraid that the convention would create a new set of laws that would give too much power to the national government.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In what ways is the Texas Constitution of 1836 like today's U.S. Constitution?
KatRina [158]

Answer:

It called for a careful separation of church and state.

Explanation:

The Constitution of Texas of 1836 was established after Texas declared its independence from Mexico. This established the Republic of Texas. The constitution that was designed for this republic was very short, and it resembled that of the United States. One of the elements that these two share is the establishment of a careful separation between church and state.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did operation torch take place
krok68 [10]
It's either Algeria or Morocco
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was involved in Crédit Mobilier, and what was the purpose of this company?
stepladder [879]

Answer:

Credit Mobilier was a sham construction company chartered to build the Union Pacific Railroad by financing it with unmarketable bonds.

Oakes Ames of Massachusetts

James Brooks of New York

Explanation:

It provided a mechanism to dispense the immense profits from building the railroad to the board of directors and its shareholders.

5 0
2 years ago
Pretty PLEASE help: How is one of the play's central conflicts over the fate of Rome resolved? A. Brutus and Cassius are defeate
notsponge [240]
A. Brutus and Cassius are defeated at Philippi, making Antony and Octavius the leaders of Rome.

The final act ends up with Cassius and Brutus fighting against Antony and Octavius. Both Cassius and Brutus end up dying and that solidifies that Antony and Octavius will rule, although the play does hint at potential friction between the two remaining leaders.
8 0
2 years ago
Why did many Arab tribes fight against the Central powers during World War I?
fomenos
<span>The main reason  that the Arab Tribes united against the Central Powers is that Great Britain had promised the Arabs independence and it would be the first time that Arabs would have independence in much of the Middle East since the 13th century. </span>
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • On what matters did Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church agree
    7·2 answers
  • The "cult of domesticity" emphasized four qualities: piety, purity, submissiveness, and domesticity. Describe and comment on one
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following are true of the United States legislature? Select all that apply
    7·2 answers
  • During the earliest days of the American Revolution, General Washington believed that
    15·1 answer
  • The Fourteenth Amendment affected many court cases, such as Brown v. Board of Education, in which
    12·2 answers
  • How does churchill requests thats parliament shows uts support for his actions
    12·1 answer
  • Lester Maddox has been described as a vocal opponent of integration. This means that he
    13·2 answers
  • Abraham Did he write any of the Bible?
    12·1 answer
  • During the High Middle Ages (100-1300), why did France and England form unified states while Germany remained divided
    9·1 answer
  • Can somebody help me with Georgia studies on my profile?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!