Answer:
The denial of portuguese influence in the pacific region
Explanation:
Historian Frederick Merk says this concept was born out of "a sense of mission to redeem the Old World by high example ... generated by the potentialities of a new earth for building a new heaven".[4]
Historians have emphasized that "manifest destiny" was a contested concept—pre-civil war Democrats endorsed the idea but many prominent Americans (such as Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and most Whigs) rejected it. Historian Daniel Walker Howe writes, "American imperialism did not represent an American consensus; it provoked bitter dissent within the national polity ... Whigs saw America's moral mission as one of democratic example rather than one of conquest."[5]
Newspaper editor John O'Sullivan is generally credited with coining the term manifest destiny in 1845 to describe the essence of this mindset, which was a rhetorical tone;[6] however, the unsigned editorial titled "Annexation" in which it first appeared was arguably written by journalist and annexation advocate Jane Cazneau.[7] The term was used by Democrats in the 1840s to justify the war with Mexico and it was also used to divide half of Oregon with the United Kingdom. But manifest destiny always limped along because of its internal limitations and the issue of slavery, says Merk. It never became a national priority. By 1843 John Quincy Adams, originally a major supporter of the concept underlying manifest destiny, had changed his mind and repudiated expansionism because it meant the expansion of slavery in Texas.
The correct answers are B) Flooding of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers brought good soil and C) Famers developed technology for irrigation.
The characteristics that allowed southern Mesopotamia to become the cradle of civilization were the following: "Flooding of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers brought good soil and farmers developed technology for irrigation."
Sumeria is the oldest civilization known to man. They settled between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, in the Middle East region of what today is Iraq. They prospered when they developed agriculture techniques that allowed them to grow crops with the proper irrigation techniques, using the flooding of the rivers. They established important city-states such as Kish, Ur, Lagash, and Uruk.
<span>The way separation of power guards against tyranny is that separation of powers separate the powers so nobody has more power than the next person, but tyranny is just one individual or a group of people with all power. One way the federalism guards against tyranny is that federalism shares power, unlike tyranny which is one individual or a group of people are controlling everything. How does the Constitution guard against tyranny? How did the framers of the Constitution guard against tyranny? The way framers of the Constitution guarded against tyranny is that the framers of the Constitution have separated powers and none has power over another unlike tyranny, it has no separated powers it has only one person or a group with all of the power. The way this small state - large state compromise guards against.</span>
