Answer:
See below
Explanation:
From the above information, we can deduce that the stock owned by Carol and Dave falls in value by $2,000 I.e ($10,000 - $8,000) ; it is to be noted that Carol solely has realised and recognized loss of $2,000.
Here, one of the cogent factors that determines whether a sale has taken place is if realization has been effected. Here, stock sold by Carol qualifies as a disposition while the decline in the value of stock sold by Dave does not qualify as disposition.
With regards to the foregoing, we can conclude that the federal income tax law treat the decline in the value of the stock differently for Carol and Dave.
Answer:
D. customer service
Explanation:
Erica has kept on doing business with Abroad Standard, Inc. on a consistent basis which shows that she has overtime, gained satisfactory levels of dealings and thus, kept dealing with the said company. Customer service is thus, not one of the environmental forces that ASI needs to be mindful of with regard to the use of technology.
<span>Challenge 1: Technology in the enterprise comes from consumers. Applications such as email and voicemail traditionally sprung from the enterprise itself, with user adoption neatly controlled by IT. Today a lot of technology is coming from consumers directly. Consumers who have been using Web 2.0 tools such as instant messaging, wikis, and discussion forums in their home and social life for years are now the employees expecting the same types of applications in the workplace. What's more, they expect the same levels of performance and ease of accessibility.
Add to this the rapid pace of technology, the varied forms of Web 2.0 communications, the sheer amount of content being moved, the increasing mobility of employees, realities of a global workforce (e.g., accommodating varying time zones), and the impact all of this has on your network . . . well, the challenge becomes even greater. How do enterprises keep up with this demand?</span>
When the price of the good is fixed at a level below the current (equilibrium) price, there will be a shortage of the good and the good will have to be effectively rationed. As in the question above, the consumer is worse off because she is not able to attain her utility maximizing point.
