1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luden [163]
4 years ago
13

True or false: Hitler believed that Germany would have won World War I if the military hadn't been "stabbed in the back" or betr

ayed by the civilian leadership ("November Criminals") that took power from the Kaiser in late 1918.
History
2 answers:
lukranit [14]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Tema [17]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The narrative of a shameful "betrayal" or "stabbing in the back" was a story associated with Germany´s defeat in WWI constructed as part of the manipulative Nazi party´s propaganda in the 1930s. Extreme right propaganda usually resorts to victimization and conspirative theories to manipulate historical events and people in a way that serves their political goals.  

You might be interested in
The Vietcong were Communist rebels that moved throughout the jungle. *<br> true or false
erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer: I think its true

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What part of Texas are the 4 national forests that were astablished during the Great Depression
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Davy Crockett, Angelina, Sabine National Forests and Sam Houston

Hope i helped ^-^

7 0
4 years ago
What is the Kremlin's preferred narrative of Russian history? And, why doesn't
Vikki [24]

Answer:

The long reach of the past seems to in any case to be causing the Kremlin some uneasiness. The impacts of the interruption related with the October Upheaval and the resulting arrangement of the Soviet Association infiltrated all aspects of Russian life. A profound association with the past is as yet felt by numerous conventional Russians. I caught a lady in her mid sixties indignantly taking steps to cast a ballot against Vladimir Putin in the impending races since he wouldn't commend the October Unrest. These sentiments are subsiding, however gradually, writes Alexander Nekrassov.

The centennial year of the October Upset showed that the Kremlin is dismissing the Soviet progressive heritage. The Russian state, itself to a great extent a progressive heritage, likes to see in 1917 examination material to evaluate and to gain from. The authority approach currently is to instruct another age of Russians who never commended the October Transformation.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Do you think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Why or why not?
Vlada [557]
This is a matter of opinion.  Do YOU think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it?  Let's look at the factors.

What were some of the positives?  Well, firstly, it ended World War II.  That's kind of a big deal.  In fact, it caused Japan not only to surrender, but UNCONDITIONALLY surrender.  Basically, that means the US could ask Japan to do whatever it liked--which the US liked!  Secondly, it was a triumph of science.  The atomic bomb was a revolutionary work of science.  Nothing like it had ever been made before, and it was all based on secrecy and theoretical science.  The atomic bomb also <span>provided the basis for new, improved weapons, including the hydrogen bomb.  </span>Thirdly, it helped establish the United States as a world power.  Knowing about this super powerful weapon the US had, countries were likely to back off!  

But there's a lot of negatives here, too.  Keep in mind that most of these benefits were for the United States alone.  Of course, there was one other BIG negative for the United States, and that's cost.  The atomic bomb was worth billions of dollars!  A second big one wasn't so much for the United States as for the world, especially Japan.  When the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the effects on the people and city were devastating.  People were vaporized.  Cities and buildings were flattened, and nothing is left but carnage.  People died, their skin peeling off, from cancer and radiation.  It was awful!  Thirdly, it caused the arms race.  Knowing the US had this super weapon, ALL the countries started building their own.  Now, we pretty much live in fear of all the nuclear weapons there are today--which are hundreds of times more powerful each than the first bomb!

So what do you think?  Was it worth it?
6 0
4 years ago
What did copernicus, brahe, kepler, galileo, and newton each contribute to the scientific revolution?
Masja [62]
Copernicus<span> contributed the heliocentric model of the universe, </span>Brahe<span> contributed astronomical data, </span>Kepler<span> contributed elliptical orbits of planets, </span>Galileo<span> contributed his telescopic discoveries, and </span>Newton<span> contributed his laws of gravitation.
</span>
https://quizlet.com/8423267/chapter-14-17-flash-cards/
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • From this lesson, the Vietnamese Tran dynasty is known for _____.
    13·2 answers
  • How was abraham lincoin made an impact on other's lives?
    14·2 answers
  • What happened to american defense spending under president reagan?
    11·1 answer
  • Which city has the highest elevation jackson florida or columbus ohio?
    10·2 answers
  • Where was the main village of the Natchez located? O along the Gulf Coast O along Bayou Teche along the Mississippi River along
    7·1 answer
  • As a result of the system of mass production, the majority of factory owners
    8·2 answers
  • The United States received a significant influx of immigrants from __________ between 2004 and 2010. A. Canada B. Central Americ
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the United States v. Nixon case important? A. It placed new legal limits on the president's power. B. It restricted Cong
    11·1 answer
  • What was the period of time when Congress tried to punish the South for the Civil War?
    11·1 answer
  • How many seconds do they have in a day
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!