1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brut [27]
3 years ago
15

In your opinion, based on what you learned this Unit, were the labor unions effective in protecting workers from poor working co

nditions? Please answer in at least 5-7 sentences, providing examples and specific details.
History
1 answer:
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Unions have a substantial impact on the compensation and work lives of both unionized and non-unionized workers. This report presents current data on unions’ effect on wages, fringe benefits, total compensation, pay inequality, and workplace protections.

Some of the conclusions are:

Unions raise wages of unionized workers by roughly 20% and raise compensation, including both wages and benefits, by about 28%.

Unions reduce wage inequality because they raise wages more for low- and middle-wage workers than for higher-wage workers, more for blue-collar than for white-collar workers, and more for workers who do not have a college degree.

Strong unions set a pay standard that nonunion employers follow. For example, a high school graduate whose workplace is not unionized but whose industry is 25% unionized is paid 5% more than similar workers in less unionized industries.

The impact of unions on total nonunion wages is almost as large as the impact on total union wages.

The most sweeping advantage for unionized workers is in fringe benefits. Unionized workers are more likely than their nonunionized counterparts to receive paid leave, are approximately 18% to 28% more likely to have employer-provided health insurance, and are 23% to 54% more likely to be in employer-provided pension plans.

Unionized workers receive more generous health benefits than nonunionized workers. They also pay 18% lower health care deductibles and a smaller share of the costs for family coverage. In retirement, unionized workers are 24% more likely to be covered by health insurance paid for by their employer.

Unionized workers receive better pension plans. Not only are they more likely to have a guaranteed benefit in retirement, their employers contribute 28% more toward pensions.

Unionized workers receive 26% more vacation time and 14% more total paid leave (vacations and holidays).

Unions play a pivotal role both in securing legislated labor protections and rights such as safety and health, overtime, and family/medical leave and in enforcing those rights on the job. Because unionized workers are more informed, they are more likely to benefit from social insurance programs such as unemployment insurance and workers compensation. Unions are thus an intermediary institution that provides a necessary complement to legislated benefits and protections.

The union wage premium

It should come as no surprise that unions raise wages, since this has always been one of the main goals of unions and a major reason that workers seek collective bargaining. How much unions raise wages, for whom, and the consequences of unionization for workers, firms, and the economy have been studied by economists and other researchers for over a century (for example, the work of Alfred Marshall). This section presents evidence from the 1990s that unions raise the wages of unionized workers by roughly 20% and raise total compensation by about 28%.

The research literature generally finds that unionized workers’ earnings exceed those of comparable nonunion workers by about 15%, a phenomenon known as the “union wage premium.”

H. Gregg Lewis found the union wage premium to be 10% to 20% in his two well-known assessments, the first in the early 1960s (Lewis 1963) and the second more than 20 years later (Lewis 1986). Freeman and Medoff (1984) in their classic analysis, What Do Unions Do?, arrived at a similar conclusion.

Table 1 provides several estimates of the union hourly wage premium based on household and employer data from the mid- to late 1990s. All of these estimates are based on statistical analyses that control for worker and employer characteristics such as occupation, education, race, industry, and size of firm. Therefore, these estimates show how much collective bargaining raises the wages of unionized workers compared to comparable nonunionized workers.                                                                                                                                          

The Website i got the info from:https://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp143/

You might be interested in
What did Andreas Vesalius, William Harvey, and Robert Hooke have in common?
never [62]

Answer:

They were all part of the scientific revolution

Explanation:

William Harvey

Through dissection, Harvey (1578-1657) was the first to demonstrate that the circulation of blood through the human body is continuous, rather than consisting of different types circulating through the veins and arteries, as had been previously assumed by the ancient Greek physician, Galen.

Andreas Vesalius

As a student and professor in Belgium and Paris, Vesalius (1514-1564) was educated in the anatomical works and theories of the ancient Greek physician Galen, whose views on anatomy had long been the standard in Europe. Vesalius questioned Galen's authority, and published On the Fabric of the Human Body in 1543. It is considered the first great modern work of science, and the foundation of modern biology.

So Andreas Vesalius, William Harvey, Anton van Leeuwenhoek and

Robert Hooke made historic advances in our understanding of living things,

yet were not responsible for true paradigm shifts or concepts of major

significance. ‘There emerged no theory of protozoans, theory of human

anatomy and physiology, or theory of insect structure – nor could any

theories emerge since no fundamental questions were being asked, no major

hypotheses being tested.’

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13918854-700-review-life-biology-and-almost-everything/#ixzz7VU4qEwsZ

7 0
2 years ago
Lincoln’s goals for Reconstruction, as discussed in his second inaugural address, were to
victus00 [196]
The answer is A because he wanted to unite both parts of the nation and he said in his speech and i quote "Yet, if God's will that it will continue, until all the wealth piled by the bonds-men's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited soil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn by the sword, as was said '"the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether"' Lincoln says they will not stop until the blood spilled from the slaves is equal to the amount that is spilled by the South if you need anymore help ask me hope i helped you
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The coming of Columbus and other Europeans to the Americas brought many changes to the Americas, some of them positive and other
marissa [1.9K]

The Europeans brought many deadly diseases with them from Europe. The Native Americans did not have the antibodies to deal with these unknown sicknesses so most of their population died off.
5 0
3 years ago
Guys please help please
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

In the late 1800's, economic, political and religious motives prompted European nations to expand their rule over other regions with the goal to make the empire bigger.

Explanation:

I think I already answered this but here lol can you mark all the ones I answered brainliest! Thanks

6 0
3 years ago
What was overall impact of the Columbian Exchange on the continents of North America, South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia? T
zavuch27 [327]

Option C. Columbus underwent deep voyages and discovered the present day America. He also discovered the marine route which associated the old Eastern world to the new Western world.

After the establishment of Sea route there was exchange of goods with other countries started. But the negative impact was that people of Eurasia were not healthy with high levels of immunity.  

The interchange of food supplies also initiated the arrival of dangerous diseases too and major part of the European, native American and Asian population died causing shortage of human labor, this gradually lead to the slavery of Africans.  

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • - 1828 Discovery of gold in north Georgia
    14·2 answers
  • the mixing of plants animals and microorganisms that occured after europeans arrived in america is known as
    12·1 answer
  • How does horizontal integration differ from vertical integration?<br> Group of answer choices
    14·1 answer
  • The black slave were first brought into Jamestown in what year?
    13·2 answers
  • The two most populated continents on earth are
    15·2 answers
  • Now it's time to compose your letter to the editor.
    13·2 answers
  • The common people supported the tyrants over<br> the nobles.<br> true or false
    5·2 answers
  • Which Native American tribe was involved in the Battle of Tippecanoe?
    12·2 answers
  • Answer the question shown on the image:) I will mark u brainliest
    9·1 answer
  • Give one reason why Northern Libya is densely populated than Southern Libya
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!