1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paraphin [41]
3 years ago
6

How did the british government react to the protests for the quartering act

History
2 answers:
ollegr [7]3 years ago
5 0

The reaction of the British government was to suspend the Governor of New York and its legislature.

Viefleur [7K]3 years ago
4 0
They were to repeal the Townshend Acts. They revoked all of the taxes imposed by these acts except for the tax on tea. When the Townshend taxes were imposed, there was a great deal of protest in the colonies.

hope this helped
You might be interested in
How did the us change as it grew
Sergio [31]
The U.S changed since the ending of slavery. Slavery was a horror in American History and something that we African Americans take seriously but it also applies to many black and white Americans as well.
Since the ending of the Civil War from 1861 to 1865 which lasted 4 years, black Americans were protected with the 14th amendment but were not equally given equal rights. This was a main issue for blacks and whites and Congress men at that time because they did not know what to do in order for everyone to agree on one specific thing. The Declaration of independence that said "All men are equal" wad a big main topic for Congress leaders and for black people because the founding fathers did not include blacks people in it.
Going down to history the Jim Crow laws and segregation was a big nightmare for black people. Jim Crow law was a law that separated blacks and whites still given "equality" to both sides but not really, because it meant that blacks and whites could not go to public places together and were divided which lead to segregation which impacted many blacks people such as MLK, Rosa Parks, Malcolm X and many to fight for freedom, equality, and justice for all.
Segregation ended finally and black people were happy but whites were not. Many riots where happening in the South and some in the North but that did not stop African Americans from doing more changes that would change American History for ever.
So that is how U.S changed.
*didn't want to go down into details to much so I just said the ones that I knew*
5 0
3 years ago
Teenement apartments at the twentieth century were
loris [4]

Tenement apartments at the beginning of the twentieth century were

spacious but crowded.

small and dangerous.

crowded but safe.

renovated and spacious.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following properly
kompoz [17]
B. France believed Germany would not invade or attack their nation

In the early stages of the war, France and Germany were at a stalemate with hardly any action in the western front until the German blitzkrieg on May 10th, 1940 which caught allied forces off guard. The encirclement of British forces at Dunkirk and the fall of Paris led to the surrender of France.
7 0
3 years ago
2b. Explain the point of view of the Prime Minister concerning education for black South Africans.
koban [17]

Verwoerd was an authoritarian, socially conservative leader and an Afrikaner nationalist. He was a member of the Afrikaner Broederbond, an exclusively white and Christian Calvinist secret organization dedicated to advancing the Afrikaner "volk" interests, and like many members of the organization had verbally supported Germany during World War II. Broederbond members like Verwoerd would assume high positions in government upon the Nationalist electoral victory in 1948 and come to wield a profound influence on public and civil society throughout the apartheid era in South Africa.

Verwoerd's desire to ensure white, and especially Afrikaner dominance in South Africa, to the exclusion of the country's nonwhite majority, was a major aspect of his support for a republic (though removing the British monarchy was long a nationalist aspiration anyway). To that same end, Verwoerd greatly expanded apartheid.[citation needed] He branded the system as a policy of "good-neighborliness", stating that different races and cultures could only reach their full potential if they lived and developed apart from each other, avoiding potential cultural clashes,[neutrality is disputed] and that the white minority had to be protected from the majority non-white in South Africa by pursuing a "policy of separate development" namely apartheid and keeping power firmly in the hands of whites.[citation needed] Given Verwoerd's background as a social science academic, he attempted to justify apartheid on ethical and philosophical grounds. This system however saw the complete disfranchisement of the nonwhite population.[2]

Verwoerd heavily repressed opposition to apartheid during his premiership. He ordered the detention and imprisonment of tens of thousands of people and the exile of further thousands, while at the same time greatly empowering, modernizing, and enlarging the white apartheid state's security forces (police and military). He banned black organizations such as the African National Congress and the Pan Africanist Congress, and it was under him that future president Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for life for sabotage.[3][4] Verwoerd's South Africa had one of the highest prison populations in the world and saw a large number of executions and floggings. By the mid-1960s Verwoerd's government to a large degree had put down internal civil resistance to apartheid by employing extraordinary legislative power, draconian laws, psychological intimidation, and the relentless efforts of the white state's security forces.

Apartheid as a program began in 1948 with D. F. Malan's premiership, but it was Verwoerd's large role in its formulation and his efforts to place it on a firmer legal and theoretical footing, including his opposition to even the limited form of integration known as baasskap, that have led him to be dubbed the "Architect of Apartheid". His actions prompted the passing of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761, condemning apartheid, and ultimately leading to South Africa's international isolation and economic sanctions. On 6 September 1966, Verwoerd was stabbed several times by parliamentary aide Dimitri Tsafendas. He died shortly after, and Tsafendas was jailed until his death in 1999.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the colonists throw the tea overboard in the Boston Tea Party? Question 9 options:
ICE Princess25 [194]
Well, from among the choices given your answer is going to be B. This is because the British had been taxing people and taking tea and selling it. So everyone threw it overboard as a sign of rebellion.







I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does reverent mean
    9·2 answers
  • Witch one is it?? ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • What goes in the blank? Congress, bitterly divided along sectional lines, had not been able to agree on whether to allow slavery
    12·1 answer
  • What were the war strategies of the two sides in the civil war?
    14·1 answer
  • 11)
    12·1 answer
  • How have telecommunications and associated devices have evolved since the 1990s.
    6·1 answer
  • [25 Points!! Brainlist] This is about the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak.
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best summarizes the cause of nationalist revolutions in Central and South America
    13·1 answer
  • Slave-trading post developed along the west coast if Africa because it was . A B C
    9·1 answer
  • Which is a correct statement about the development of copernicus’s model after his death?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!