1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iogann1982 [59]
3 years ago
14

What conclusion can be drawn from this table

History
2 answers:
Alinara [238K]3 years ago
8 0
It is very boring and not worth my time
Aleks [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

i do not know

Explanation:

what is it

You might be interested in
Which of the following people could not attend the constitutional convention?
Alborosie
<span>Richard Henry Lee
Patrick Henry
Thomas Jefferson
John Adams
Samuel Adams 
John Hancock</span>
3 0
3 years ago
The discipline archeology evolved from antiquarianism -old / traditional archeology processual -post processual- modern archaeol
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

the answer to this is A true

6 0
3 years ago
Why did George Calvert’s sons draft the Maryland Toleration Act?
jolli1 [7]
To protect Catholics after England fell under Puritan rule
6 0
3 years ago
Explain ONE way in which the Pueblo Revolts differed from the Cossack Revolts.
daser333 [38]

Answer:

ONE way in which the Pueblo Revolts differed from the Cossack Revolts is:

While the Pueblo revolts had religious coloration, the Cossacks revolts were political.

Explanation:

The Pueblo Revolts occurred in 1680 and lasted for 12 years only.  They were revolts against the forced conversion of Pueblo Indians to Christianity.  On the other hand, the Cossack revolts were a series of military conflicts engineered by Cossacks against the various (Polish, Lithuanian, and Russian)  states that tried to dominate them in their territories during the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries.   This implies that the Cossacks revolts were politically-inclined, while the Pueblo revolts were mainly religious.

8 0
3 years ago
In the​ 1950s, the economist Bela Balassa compared 28 manufacturing industries in the United States and Britain. In every one of
wolverine [178]

Answer:

Yes there would be a gain to the United States from importing any of those products from Britain because it only has absolute advantage not comparative advantage.

Explanation:

Absolute advantage in international trade is the ability of a nation to produce more goods with its resources without considering that  there might a better alternative to which resources can be deployed that would yield more output compared to its trading partners.

While on the other hand ,comparative advantage is when a country has a lower opportunity costs in producing an item compared to its rival nations.

Which means the country that has comparative advantage is given up less opportunities when producing its desired goods viz-a-viz its competing nations.

In other words,absolute advantage does not guarantee efficiency,only comparative advantage does.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What factor contributed to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II? (2 points)
    5·2 answers
  • How did Descartes’s approach to science differ from Bacon’s?
    11·1 answer
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these witters combined history with stories about gods ​
    9·1 answer
  • What role does the President play in the organization of a party?. . . AThe President’s role for a major party is not as importa
    11·2 answers
  • What caused King Philip to try to remove the Puritans from New England?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a true statement about the state and federal amendment processes? The process at the state level has m
    15·2 answers
  • How was Roman art different from Greek art?
    5·1 answer
  • Prompt: Based on the following documents, evaluate the extent to which the
    6·1 answer
  • Written during the <br> the articles of confederation was ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!