1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pani-rosa [81]
3 years ago
9

Which terms designates the legal ability of a party to enter into a contract?

Law
1 answer:
Margaret [11]3 years ago
7 0

Since, the options have not been given the question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows.

Which of the following terms designates the legal ability of a party to enter into a contract?

A)Consent

B)Affirmation

C)Materiality

D)Capacity

Answer: D) Capacity

Explanation:

The legal capacity can be defined as the ability of the person or party to legally enter into a contract. In the legal capacity, the person or property is entitled to get the specific details of the contract, acceptance or a kind of agreement of contract, consideration, and which will involve the material of interest that can be exchanged between the two parties and commitment of both parties or single person related to the contract.

You might be interested in
An object with a mass of 1298 kg is accelerating at a rate of 17 m/s? when a net force is applied to it. What is themagnitude of
nlexa [21]
Belive me I know the answer to your question sir
6 0
3 years ago
I'm not discussing grades at this time.
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

Okay?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If nene had 15=2056= what
Neko [114]

Answer:

I dont know

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The military's death penalty law requires court members (the military's equivalent to civilian jurors) to possess specific requi
ahrayia [7]

Answer:

FALSE

Explanation:

All the court member must be composed by military personnel and the only requirment is that they must be commissioned or warrant officers.

7 0
3 years ago
Eloise plans to build an addition on her house that she will operate as a bed and breakfast. The town rejects her plans on the g
denis23 [38]

Answer:

a violation of procedural due process requirements

Explanation:

Hearing a case involving legal matters should be done fairly and impartially. For this reason, these hearings should be made by a professional, a judge, who will act impartially between the two parties, assessing and interpreting the case based on legislation and not with secondary interests. In the case set out in the question above, if the mayor of the city acts as a judge at the hearing, this will violate the procedural requirements of due process of law. This is because even if the mayor is a judge, there is no guarantee that he will act impartially, in which case we can say that if the mayor is the judge, the process will not be concluded fairly.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • David was accused of a serious crime, and thus, had to face trial. A US trial court declared David guilty by the end of the proc
    9·1 answer
  • What does i move to strike the last word mean in congress
    15·1 answer
  • In Criminal & Civil Law, what is a DEFENDANT
    5·1 answer
  • The algebraic sum of current at any circuit junction is =0​
    7·1 answer
  • QUESTION 2
    9·1 answer
  • When there is a
    9·1 answer
  • What types of laws are created by the judicial branch of government?
    11·2 answers
  • How were the first departments affected at the close of the Civil War?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the basis of international law?
    7·2 answers
  • Part of an investigator’s job is to look for and collect physical evidence at crime scenes.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!