I believe he is a social psychologist.
social psychologist studies how the actions and behavior of certain individuals could affect the actions and behavior of <span>another individuals</span>.
Things such as prejudice could affect level of trust that influence one's behavior toward that individual.
The empire had a huge standing army of cavalry, infantry and war elephants.
All of the above because they are not just for emergency cars or something they all are used for other things too
Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.