1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
chubhunter [2.5K]
3 years ago
13

What was one way progressives wanted to protect the rights of children

History
2 answers:
stiks02 [169]3 years ago
8 0
Child labor is one of the ways
professor190 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

eliminating child labor

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Before becoming president of the United States, Lyndon Baines Johnson had been a leader in Congress for more than two decades.
Yakvenalex [24]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

The statement is <u>false</u>. Lyndon Baines Johnson was never a leader in Congress for two decades.

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

Lyndon B. Johnson's political career began when he ran for Congress in 1937 as a democrat. He was the 10th Texas Congressman and served from 1937-1949. He also became the Lieutenant Commander for the US Navy during his reign as a congressman where he fought in several battles.

From Congressman he became a Senator from 1949 until 1961 where he held high prestige titles such as Democratic whip, Senate minority leader, Senate minority leader, etc. He was later elected as the 37th President of the US.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is another name for the enlightenment?
ruslelena [56]
The Enlightenment (the age of Enlightenment) is period in Europe characterized with big intellectual and philosophical movement. 
The another name that describes this period is the Age of reason. The ideas in the age of reason were focused on <span>like </span>progress<span>, 
</span>tolerance<span>, liberty, </span>fraternity<span>, </span>constitutional government<span> and </span>separation of church and state<span>.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Why might irene emerson have rejected dred scotts offer to purchase his family and their freedom
notka56 [123]

Answer:

ONIONS

Explanation:

In its 1857 decision that stunned the nation, the United States Supreme Court upheld slavery in United States territories, denied the legality of black citizenship in America, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. All of this was the result of an April 1846 action when Dred Scott innocently made his mark with an "X," signing his petition in a pro forma freedom suit, initiated under Missouri law, to sue for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. Desiring freedom, his case instead became the lightning rod for sectional bitterness and hostility that was only resolved by war.

image of Dred Scott

Dred Scott

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

"Dred Scott, a man of color, respectfully states. he is claimed as a slave."

(Petition to Sue for Freedom, 6 April 1846)

Initially, Scott's case for freedom was routine and relatively insignificant, like hundreds of others that passed through the St. Louis Circuit Court. The cases were allowed because a Missouri statute stated that any person, black or white, held in wrongful enslavement could sue for freedom. The petition that Dred Scott signed indicated the reasons he felt he was entitled to freedom. Scott's owner, Dr. John Emerson, was a United States Army surgeon who traveled to various military posts in the free state of Illinois and the free Wisconsin Territory. Dred Scott traveled with him and, therefore, resided in areas where slavery was outlawed. Because of Missouri's long-standing "once free, always free" judicial standard in determining freedom suits, slaves who were taken to such areas were freed-even if they returned to the slave state of Missouri. Once the bonds of slavery were broken, they did not reattach.

Dred Scott was born to slave parents in Virginia sometime around the turn of the nineteenth century. His parents may have been the property of Peter Blow, or Blow may have purchased Scott at a later date. The mystery of exact ownership is one that would follow Dred Scott, and later his family, throughout their lives as slaves. With few records extant, it is difficult to identify exactly when ownership of the family was transferred to various parties. By 1830, Peter Blow had settled his family of four sons and three daughters and his six slaves in St. Louis. This was after having moved from Virginia to Alabama, to attempt farming near Huntsville, and, when that failed, a move from Alabama to Missouri. In St. Louis, Peter Blow undertook the running of a boarding house, the Jefferson Hotel. Within a year, though, his wife Elizabeth died and on June 23, 1832, Peter Blow passed away.

image of front view of St. Louis

Front view of St. Louis

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

The Blow children remained in St. Louis after the deaths of their parents and became well established in the city's society through marriage to prominent families. Charlotte Taylor Blow married Joseph Charless, Jr., in November 1831; his father had established the first newspaper west of the Mississippi River and had been a leading opponent of slavery while editor. Charless, Jr., operated a wholesale drug and paint store, Charless & Company (later Charless, Blow, & Company when brothers-in-law Henry Taylor Blow and Taylor Blow became partners). Martha Ella Blow married attorney Charles Drake in 1835. Drake is better known in history for his role in the creation of Missouri's 1865 constitution. As a leader of the Radical Republican Party after the Civil War, he was determined to punish those considered Southern sympathizers; the constitution he helped author took away many of their rights, including enfranchisement. Peter Ethelrod Blow married Eugenie LaBeaume in 1833. She was from an old French banking family; her oldest brother was a wealthy businessman who, in partnership with Blow, formed Peter E. Blow & Company. She had two other brothers; one was the St. Louis County sheriff for a time in the 1840s, and one, Charles Edmund LaBeaume, was a St. Louis attorney who played an important role in Dred Scott's freedom suits. All of these St. Louis connections proved helpful to Dred Scott.

<h2>Hope this helps :)</h2>
5 0
3 years ago
All across the north, what groups lobbied against the fugitive slave act of 1850?
andre [41]

There is a lot of opposition to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 in the Northern states, which are vehemently against slavery and is the destination of many escaped slaves from the South. Some states tried to nullify the Federal law, notably Wisconsin Supreme Court and Vermont legislature. Of course, abolitionists are vehemently against the law.

3 0
3 years ago
Please help!<br> heyyyy!! you thought it was a question eh? lol hru? (free pts)
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

oh kool tyty :))))

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Historical documents are
    6·1 answer
  • Rewrite of the Gettysburg Address
    5·1 answer
  • Removal of legal and social barriers that impose separation of groups is
    12·2 answers
  • What did the United States do in response to Japan's invasion of French Indochina?
    5·1 answer
  • Following this agreement, the Germans experienced an economic depression, desired revenge, and had new leaders come to power.
    5·2 answers
  • How do you think religious freedom led to political freedom ?
    12·1 answer
  • Anong ilog ang dumadaloy sa kapatagan ng Latium?​
    12·1 answer
  • What was the behavior of the British towards the Native Americans both during and after the Revolutionary War?
    9·1 answer
  • Reconstruction ended with the O withdrawal of the military. O Republican takeover of Congress. O Democratic takeover of Congress
    12·2 answers
  • Going oph<br><br>bye tc <br><br>#kamina op bolte​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!