Although the spear and atlatl would continued to be used by some people after the Paleolithic Era, both were very important for Paleo-Indians of Texas is false.
During the last glacial events of the late Pleistocene epoch, Paleo-Indians, Paleoindians, or Paleo-Americans were the first peoples to enter and later settle the Americas. The Greek adjective palaios, which means "old" or "ancient," is where the prefix "paleo-" originates. In contrast to "Paleolithic," the name "Paleo-Indians" refers specifically to the lithic era in the Western Hemisphere.
According to conventional views, big-game hunters used a land bridge to traverse the Bering Strait from North Asia into the Americas (Beringia).This bridge was in use between 45,000 and 12,000 BCE (47,000–14,000 BP). Long into Alaska, isolated small bands of hunter-gatherers followed vast herds of huge mammals. Ice-free passages formed along the Pacific coast and North American valleys between approximately 16,500 and 13,500 BCE (or approximately 18,500 and 15,500 BP).
This made it possible for animals to travel southward into the continent's interior, which was followed by people. Along the coastline, people walked or utilized boats to travel. The exact times and paths by which the Americas were populated are still up for debate. At least two Paleo-Indian populations with distinct morphologies coexisted in various parts of Mexico 10,000 years ago.
Learn more about Paleo-Indians here:
brainly.com/question/13188060
#SPJ9
The correct answer is A. If in the first box of the diagram the employee is giving an unfavorable opinion about his boss in a newspaper, and in the last box there is a judge ruling a sentence, the second box has to refer to a judicial issue. As the boss is the only one injured by the employee's declaration, he is the only one who can access justice regarding this issue, so the options are limited to A and C. The correct answer ends up being A, since when arguing libel, the boss can access justice by suing his employee, not if he defended him by saying that his statement was a symbolic speech.
Answer:
the answer is Sir Francis Drake. Good luck!
The first answer seems to be the most likely answer
Answer:
So as to visit more places
Explanation:
Ibn battuta was from Morocco. The man had gone on pilgrimage to Mecca. So after his pilgrimage be decided to travel some parts of the world out of curiosity.
During the end of his travels he decided to visit west africa. He visited mali and several places like walata, kangana. In the map that is attached to this story,one can see that he didn't take a direct route after he left kangaba. The reason was so he could see more places
