Why did the Framers decide that federal judges should be appointed and not elected

History

1 answer:

Mrac [35]2 years ago

4 0

They wanted judges to make decisions based upon the law and not public opinion.

<u>Explanation</u>:

If the judges were there until they retire then they could be more objective. That is because if they had to be reelected, they could just support what the people want so as to get reelected, which would mean that they are not objective and lawful judges.

Framers were well known that judges must accountable to the people at all times. The reason behind their action was as framers were feared of victimization from the judiciary more than from the rest of the two branches, so they placed limitations intentionally on the judiciary.

You might be interested in

What terrorist attack was motivated by a struggle to unionize?

Elan Coil [88]

The correct answer is: "the destruction of the LA Times building in 1910".

The event is known as the Los Angeles Times bombing was a intentional attack planned and perfomed by a member of the union named the International Association of Bridge and Structural Iron Workers. 21 employees were killed and more than a 100 injured. The perpetrators were arrested and sentenced, and their trial became an outstanding event in the American labor movement.

4 0

3 years ago

The Russian army was led by weak leaders. In addition,

Fudgin [204]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

it was lead by weak leaders

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who wasnt at the Second Continental CongressA:John AdamsB:Patrick HenryC:Benedict ArnoldC:Richard Henry Lee