Why did the Framers decide that federal judges should be appointed and not elected

History

1 answer:

Mrac [35]2 years ago

4 0

They wanted judges to make decisions based upon the law and not public opinion.

<u>Explanation</u>:

If the judges were there until they retire then they could be more objective. That is because if they had to be reelected, they could just support what the people want so as to get reelected, which would mean that they are not objective and lawful judges.

Framers were well known that judges must accountable to the people at all times. The reason behind their action was as framers were feared of victimization from the judiciary more than from the rest of the two branches, so they placed limitations intentionally on the judiciary.

You might be interested in

Who were the first people to really promote worshipping only one god?

loris [4]

Christopher Columbus was the first

6 0

2 years ago

If you lived in Germany in 1933, you might have seen which of the following? Select all that apply.

Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

theres no attachment or answers o3o

6 0

2 years ago

Why is trade considered mutually beneficial?

GenaCL600 [577]

The first option have a good dayyy

4 0

2 years ago

Choose a food or drink product which you like or consume every day and describe how it is made.Find pictures to illustrate your

sveticcg [70]

Tea. The plant is grown and the leave plucked off it. Leaves dry then are crushed. Crushed leaves put in bag then soaked in hot water.

Amazing English ^

7 0

3 years ago

How is executive selected in the UK

Effectus [21]

Answer:

The government is led by the Prime Minister, who selects all the other ministers. ... Under the uncodified British constitution, executive authority lies with the monarch, although this authority is exercised only by, or on the advice of, the prime minister and the cabinet.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago