I think the answer is Sweep
Say hey I am interviewing this person he or she is 16 years old she is from Colombia her favorite sport is basketball she is a shy girl or boy
Running for the bus, the rain began to pour.
If you really think about, it's saying that the rain is running for the bus, which makes NO sense. Here, read it again...
<em>Running for the bus, the rain </em>began to pour.
The author wasn't specific about <em>who </em>exactly was running for the bus.
Not sure if it asks you to do this, but if you were to change it and make it agree, it would be "<u><em>As I was running for the bus</em></u><u>,</u> the rain began to pour." There're other ways to write it of course, but the point is that now you know who actually ran for the bus, and it makes sense.
Answer and Explanation:
<u>What functions as a subject is not really the relative clause, but the relative pronoun - "that".</u> Relative pronouns can act as subjects or objects in the clause they introduce. Let's compare:
1. I am the only person who saw Erica.
2. I am the only person who Erica saw and recognized.
Notice that in sentence 1, "who" is the subject of the clause "saw Erica". However, in sentence 2, "who" is the object. The subject of the verb "saw" now is "Erica".
<u>The same happens in the clause "that was hurt before". The relative pronoun "that" - which is substituting the noun "ankle" - is the subject of the clause "was hurt before". Therefore, we can say its noun function is the subject.</u>
Which one of what? You don't say the choices:)
