Answer:
Yes, Rawls could collect.
Explanation:
It is possible that Rawls collects damages due to negligence. This is due to the fact that the main cause of the accident was not substantiated by the Progressive Northern Insurance Company. The company claimed that the accident could have been caused by a series of events and the company was also not certain about the main cause of the accident.
After reading the segment, "let's go to
the movies," in the spotlight on small business box, you would suggest to
Sam that he differentiate the offering by transforming at least one of the
screens into a space where patrons can experience dinner and a movie.
Answer:
Department of commerce
Explanation:
U.S.-based companies should turn to the department of commerce for the most comprehensive source of export information.
The department of commerce is a section in the United States government. It creates jobs through good and favorable international trade terms, sustainable development and through access to high technology.
It provides companies with trade informations of which exports is one.
Answer:
(A) $500 million
(B) This type of analysis is used to show that Special Interest Groups tend to press the government for TRANSFERS instead of ECONOMIC GROWTH.
Explanation:
1/10,000 of the real GDP is = $50,000
RGDP = 50,000 ÷ 1/10,000
RGDP = 50,000 × 10,000 = $500,000,000
If special interest group Q would have to be indifferent (not care which policy is applied at the given time) between the 2 policies, then the economic growth policy would have to increase the size of the RGDP (the economic pie) by an amount sufficient enough for them to get their net benefit of $50,000.
The RGDP figure above ($500 million) is the amount by which RGDP (real gross domestic product) should grow, if Group Q will still get their net benefit when only the economic growth policy (EGP) is applied.
In this case, the EGP applied in place of the TP (transfer policy) would still fetch Group Q the minimum net benefit of $50,000
(B) This type of analysis is used to show that Special Interest Groups tend to press the government (policy makers and enforcers) for TRANSFERS instead of ECONOMIC GROWTH.
