Answer:
He believed Taft had failed to live up to progressive ideas
The correct answer is an oligarchy
An oligarchy is a system in which a minority rules over a majority. In this case, ti would be the single political party. A historical example of this would be Sparta where a tiny minority of the population, the Spartans, ruled over the majority of the population, which was the enslaved enemies and slaves in general who weren't from wars.
<span> After 1492, people and civilizations of long separated regions had started to gain their connections. Because of this, trades and expedition between one country to another started to happen.
This created a cross culture between one region and another and an exchange of tradition, arts, knowledge, and philosophy, which marked a turning point in the history</span>
All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
