1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natulia [17]
3 years ago
12

Shakespeare’s works are well known for exploring the Renaissance ideals of humanism and blank

History
2 answers:
blondinia [14]3 years ago
7 0
C.................................
Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B) Classicism

Explanation:

William Shakespeare wrote a lot of plays that followed a classical structure, trying to make them near the greek classics and following the same path of construction and estructure, as realism wasn´t trending yet when he was alive, and his admiration and influence relayed heavily on the greek dramas he is well know for exploring the Renaissance ideals of humanism and classicism.

You might be interested in
HELP ASAPP!! The most important outcome of the Treaty of 1818 was that Britain claimed land west of the Mississippi. O the US-Ca
Mariana [72]

Explanation:

  1. how are you and me ayc and Milos what is all the wings near me miss you write a miss you a mice
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think embargoes against Britain and France failed?
AnnyKZ [126]

yes reasoning why just ask google


4 0
3 years ago
Which created the most resentment among European nations?
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Winston Churchill, who served as Britain's prime minister, once said: "Many forms of government have been tried, and will be tri
Alik [6]
<span>Brief Translation: 

Many leaders have tried, and will try in a world of sin and sadness. No-one pretends that voting is perfect. Yes, it has been said that voting is the worst type of government except all those other types that have been tried. 

Basically he's saying that democracy (voting) is better than other ways to elect a government.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did people do before the calculator was invented?
    10·2 answers
  • What more than anything else drove u.s. expansion in the late nineteenth century?
    11·2 answers
  • How did disease, brought over by the Europeans affect the Native Americans?
    15·1 answer
  • Where did Romanticism hope to find truth? A. in nature and emotion B. in the scientific method C. in the newly translated versio
    12·2 answers
  • [Law] 50pts Is it illegal for a government to pay for a murder suspect's defense lawyer?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the south respond to the tariff on 1828?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the state of the US economy at the end of World War II?
    11·2 answers
  • Tarquin the proud was a ruler<br> A. HARSH<br> B. LIFELONG<br> C. FAIR<br> D. HONEST
    11·1 answer
  • 1) Attend Indian Schools, 2) Learn English, 3) Live in designated areas, 4) Adapt to farming ---What is this list referring to?
    10·1 answer
  • What was one way the rights of free people of color were restricted?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!