1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nady [450]
3 years ago
6

Which passage in the selection from Magna Carta says that police must have evidence to put someone on trial! FROM THE MAGNA CART

A ...in future no official shall PLACE A MAN ON TRIAL upon his own UNSUPPORTED STATEMENT without PRODUCING CREDIBLE WITNESSES to TELL TRUTH OF IT.
History
2 answers:
docker41 [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Clause 38

Explanation:

1215 Magna Carta Clause 38 originally stated that : "No bailiff is in future to put anyone to law by his accusation alone, without trustworthy witnesses being brought in for this."

GrogVix [38]3 years ago
3 0

Clause 38 of the Magna Card says as follows : In future no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it. The Magna Carta is a cedula that King Juan "without land" of England granted to the English nobles in which he undertook to respect the privileges and immunities of the nobility.


You might be interested in
Describe why the "discovery" of america was one of the "most important events recorded in the history of mankind," according to
Anon25 [30]

You didn't list options, but essentially Adam Smith called the discovery of America one of the most important events in history because it led to increased trade and interchange between nations and continents, which brought about economic benefit for those involved.

In his famous book, <em>The Wealth of Nations, </em>Adam Smith said that "The discovery of America, and that of the passage to the East Indies by the Cape of Good Hope, are the two greatest events recorded in the history of mankind."  Both of these events facilitated and encouraged an increase of trade, which led to increased wealth and prosperity.

Historical context:

The basic principles of capitalism were laid out by Scottish philosopher Adam Smith in his influential book published in 1776:  <em>An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.</em>  The Nobel-prize winning 20th century economist Milton Friedman said of Adam Smith, "“The key insight of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations is misleadingly simple: If an exchange between two parties is voluntary, it will not take place unless both believe they will benefit from it."  Smith argued for such voluntary exchanges within a free market system.  He labeled the government-manipulated economic system that was prevailing in his day as "mercantilism," a system in which governments specifically authorized some merchants as the official agents of commerce (rather than endorsing free enterprise).  The mercantilist system also viewed wealth as though there were a fixed amount of it available in the world, represented by precious metals such as gold and silver, and that nations were in competition over who got more of that fixed amount of world wealth.  Smith saw that wealth was something that could be created and increased through voluntary exchange and free trade.  Smith's ideas formed the basis for what we have come to know as capitalism.  For Smith, the expansion of trade that occurred because of the discovery of the Americas and the discovery of sea routes to Asia were ways that wealth could be exchanged and increased more readily.

6 0
3 years ago
Help 30 points and please do not troll around with me
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

The first and last one.

<em>Hope that helps!</em>

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which would be the most likely reason why America would want a strong Navy during the late 1800s early 1900s?
tamaranim1 [39]
To protect our national interest and provide defence. The us was neutral at the time and aircraft didn't exist. The navy proved itself in the Quasi wars
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the way in which Islamic leaders dealt with religious minorities differ from the tactics used by Christian leaders?
amm1812
A--Islamic tolerance and Christian conversion were how the two empires addressed religions during empire building. 

The Islamic empires often used systems of tolerance allowing for multiple religions to exist in their empire. At times, they would impose taxes on differing religions but rarely were people forced to give up their religion. For Christians, conversion was important. As they built empires in Asia, Africa, and the Americas, native peoples were forced to convert to Christian religions. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the median of the box-and-whisker plot?
Degger [83]

c is the answer to this question.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The British established the East India Company to acquire
    14·2 answers
  • The rule of law applies equally to people in government and citizens alike true or false
    14·1 answer
  • Why we're many important scientists drawn to universities during the scientific revolution
    8·1 answer
  • What did the supreme court order us schools to do in 1954 apex?
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me with number 6 and my business is a bakery shop.so we’re supposed to write a summary of our business
    7·1 answer
  • Why did some American leaders oppose proposals to make Hawaii a us state
    8·1 answer
  • Political parties were often called this in the early years of our republic.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the domino theory? How does it connect to the US containment policy?
    8·1 answer
  • What are the most important events of the native American timeline shared​
    13·1 answer
  • How did the ten aims or goals of the Communist Party reveal the party’s beliefs and goals?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!