The troops tried to send supplies but there was a blockade and they were not able to deliver them.
hope it helped <span />
Oklahoma's economic history is divided into four periods. The first period covers the nineteenth century, encompassing settlement by American Indians of the Southeast followed by new arrangements facilitating private land ownership. The second extends from 1900 to the onset of the Great Depression in 1930. The third ends in 1973 with the first of the major oil shocks. The fourth comprises the energy boom and bust of the late twentieth century, along with contemporary conditions.
The century from 1800 to 1900 encompassed the time of Indian and white settlement. During the nineteenth century Oklahoma was characterized by very high ratios of land to labor and capital, by almost total dominance of primary (natural resource based) production, and by unique institutional and cultural features, of which the effects of some remain important in today's economy. The initial settlement by the Five Civilized Tribes in the 1820s, 1830s, and 1840s in what is now Oklahoma (at that time Indian Territory) did not reflect free-market labor migration in response to income differentials. Added to the coercion of removal was the fact that the Five Tribes had adopted the institution of slavery in their former southern setting. Slave-owning Indians brought with them an additional labor supply.
Answer:
My opinion is that it is fair that the Jewish People have a place to claim as their own, that is also their ancestral land, since they have been an errand people since the times of the Roman Empire, who have been expelled from many countries, and who have been subject to discrimination and poor treament.
However, it would also be fair that the Palestian Arabs have a share of the land too, because they were dwelling those land for more than a millenium before the Jewish began to settle back. This is why the most reasonable policy for the area would be a two state solution: one state for the Jewish People, and one state for the Palestinian Arabs.
They had a new general and created an ambush
The Anglo-American hunger for Indian lands was the other event that happened in the United States at this time which influenced the support for the Dawes Act.
<h3>What was the Dawes Act?</h3>
It was a federal legislation that was passed to turn the Native Americans into farmers and landowners by providing cooperating families with 160 acres of reservation land for farming or 320 acres for grazing.
As it was intended to give the Native American family head 320 acres of grazing land or 160 acres of farmland, it also have some aims that includes:
- allotment of land
- vocational training
- education
- divine intervention.
The promised acreages were comparable to those promised by the Homestead Act but there were important differences between the two acts.
Here, the Native tribes already controlled the land that was being returned to them at a fraction of the acreage, but they were not accustomed to a life of standardized ranching and agriculture and the lands allotted to them were often unsuitable for farming.
Read more about Dawes Act
brainly.com/question/905111
#SPJ1
