All categories

4 years ago

Do you think the United States should continue to execute criminals? Why or why not

2 answers:

8 0

I believe that it important for The US to continue to execute criminals. This is important because we don't want criminals to be running around shooting up people and causing trouble. We are already doing a good job dealing with criminals and putting them in prison aren't we? Why should we change? This is also a big part in polices jobs, so if we didn't continue to put criminals in jail, then how to police get payed, and how do we continue to get the security we need? Know even though this is a obvious question, on the other hand people could make a counter that it takes up too much space in prisons. Know this however is a reasonable argument, we have to punish criminals somehow correct? It's essentially grounding a six year old from not doing what he/she is told. The kid has to get punished somehow correct? Just like everyone in the world should be put in their place depending on whether it's murder or something less intense. That is just how the world is. We live and learn, but of course it is unacceptable to murder, hurt, or cause any abuse or harm to someone in any way.

Montano1993 [528]4 years ago

6 0

The United States should continue to execute criminals. Although every human life is precious and should not be taken for granted, for example if one is in jail for a lifetime then it would make sense to execute criminals

You might be interested in

What are SOME of your goals about graduating collage?

maria [59]

Some goals are to be a doctor and get High paying job buy a house the barrier is money without money I would not be able to go to medical school and I also can not buy. A house

5 0

3 years ago

AFIS is a fingerprint identification system that uses _______________ methodology

Sergio [31]

Answer:

biometric identification

Explanation:

_______

3 0

3 years ago

What was depleted by the time that oxygen became abundant

Alex777 [14]

The Gaia Theory was proposed. By the british.

4 0

3 years ago

Economists often track employment trends by measuring the proportion of people who are "underemployed," meaning they are either

sasho [114]

The answer to whether the data is convincing is; Yes, it is true that the data is convincing

<h3>How to create hypothesis?</h3>

We are given;

Population Proportion; p = 17.6% = 0.176

Sample size; n = 300

Sample proportion; p^ = 45/300 = 0.15 = 15%

Formula for standard deviation here is;

σ = √(pq/n)

σ = √(p(1 - p)/n)

σ = √(0.15 * 0.85/300)

σ = 0.0206

Formula for z-score is;

z = (p^ - p)/σ

z = (0.176 - 0.15)/0.0206

z = 1

From online p-value from z-score at significance level of 0.05, we have;

p = 0.1587

The p-value is greater than the significance value and so we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the proportion of underemployed residents in Thicksburg is lower than elsewhere in the country.

Read more about Hypothesis at; brainly.com/question/15980493

6 0

2 years ago

A teacher collected information from a class of 25 students about the time, in hours, they spent studying the previous week and

djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

B. −0.72

Explanation:

The correlation coefficient is a measure of the linear association between two variables.

It is a dimensionless value bettween - 1 and +1. Hence, it does not depend on the units that are used to measure the data.

You can see the formula to calculate the correlation coefficient in the attached picture.

There you see that the numerator containts the sum of the differences of the values of the x-variable with its the mean, multiplied by the sum of the differences of the values of the y variable with its mean, while the denominator contains the square root of the product of the squares of the same differences, thus the units are canceled.

In conclusion, If the teacher changes the units of each variable from hours to minutes, the value of the correlation coefficient between minutes studying and minutes spent on the Internet will not change; it will continue being −0.72.

5 0

4 years ago