Answer:
They emphasized the expressive potential of color, employing it arbitrarily, for example, Matisse employed a pointillist style by applying paint in small dabs and dashes. (1906) appear to mimic the spontaneous, active brushwork of Impressionism,
Explanation:
Climate change, pollution, I can’t think of anything else rn I’m sorry
The first one might be from ancient Egypt, but I'm not 100%. I don't know about the culture for the last two but comparing them, I see the first one has lots of animals and people on it, which the other two don't have. one thing different about the second one is that it is only a singular thing and I can see that it is a lot more emotional than the other ones. one thing different about the last one is that it has a lot more symmetrical designs and is more abstract without animals/humans. now some things similar to the first and last are that there are a lot of small things that collectively add to the piece. and some similarities to the first and second are that it (looks like) they have something living in them.
This painting is significant for art history because it challenged the conventions of landscape painting. It is a representation of a natural scene, but nature itself isn't the real background for the painting. The background is the painter's personality and inner psychological struggle. The wheatfield is strikingly yellow, against the deep blue color of the sky, leaving an impression of uneasiness and agitation, rather than serenity. The scene is an epitome of deep, unresolved mental anxiety, from which there is no way out. The middle road, central to the painting's composition, leads nowhere.
