1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hunter-Best [27]
3 years ago
15

53

History
2 answers:
Yanka [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Egypt gained access to new resources.

Explanation:

Hatshepsut had the longest reign pharaoh in 15th Century B.C. Having being declared as a Pharaoh, she led Egypt into prospered by extensive trade and building monuments and temples. She took Egypt to flourish by developing trading networks. The Land of Punt became notable trade partner supplying Egypt with ivory, gold, wood, frankincense,  myrrh trees, resin, and wild animals when Hatshepsut sent five massive ships.

motikmotik3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is A.

Explanation:

I took the quiz.

You might be interested in
How does a totalitarian dictatorship operate
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

Totalitarianism is a concept[1][2] for a form of government or political system that prohibits opposition parties, restricts individual opposition to the state and its claims, and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It is regarded as the most extreme and complete form of authoritarianism. In totalitarian states, political power has often been held by autocrats (i.e. dictators or absolute monarchs) who employ all-encompassing campaigns in which propaganda is broadcast by state-controlled mass media.[3]

Totalitarian regimes are often characterized by extensive political repression, a complete lack of democracy, widespread personality cultism, absolute control over the economy, massive censorship, mass surveillance, limited freedom of movement (most notably freedom to leave the country) and widespread use of state terrorism. Other aspects of a totalitarian regime include the use of concentration camps, repressive secret police, religious persecution, state religion or state atheism, the common practice of executions, fraudulent elections, possible possession of weapons of mass destruction and a potential for state-sponsored mass murder and genocides. Historian Robert Conquest describes a totalitarian state as one which recognizes no limit on its authority in any sphere of public or private life and it extends that authority to whatever length is feasible.[3]

As a political ideology, totalitarianism is distinctly modern and has complex historical roots. Historian and philosopher Karl Popper traced its roots to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's conception of state and especially to the political philosophy of Karl Marx.[4] Others, like Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer, trace the origin of totalitarian doctrines to the Enlightenment, and especially to idea that man 'has become the master of the world', a master unbound by any links to nature, society, and history'.[5] In the twentieth century the idea of 'absolute state power', was developed by Italian fascists and concurrently in Germany, by jurist and later Nazi academic Carl Schmitt working during the Weimar Republic (1920s). Italian Fascist Benito Mussolini proclaimed: "Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." Schmitt used the term Totalstaat in his influential 1927 work The Concept of the Political on the legal basis of an all-powerful state.[6] The term gained prominence in Western anti-communist political discourse during the Cold War era as a tool to convert pre-World War II anti-fascism into post-war anti-communism.[7][8][9][10][11]

Totalitarian regimes are different from other authoritarian regimes. The latter denotes a state in which the single power holder, usually an individual dictator, a committee, a junta or an otherwise small group of political elite, monopolizes political power. In this sense, "the authoritarian state [...] is only concerned with political power and as long as it is not contested it gives society a certain degree of liberty."[12] Radu Cinpoes writes authoritarianism "does not attempt to change the world and human nature."[12] In contrast, Richard Pipes writes a totalitarian regime attempts to control virtually all aspects of the social life, including the economy, education, art, science, private life and morals of citizens. Some totalitarian governments may promote an elaborate ideology, with "[t]he officially proclaimed ideology" penetrating "into the deepest reaches of societal structure and the totalitarian government seeks to completely control the thoughts and actions of its citizens."[13] It also mobilizes the whole population in pursuit of its goals. Carl Joachim Friedrich wrote that "a totalist ideology, a party reinforced by a secret police, and monopoly control of [...] industrial mass society" are the three features of totalitarian regimes that distinguish them from other autocracies."[12]

5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer
kiruha [24]

Answer:

15 people lost their jobs when it went from $12 to $18

3 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between executive order and a law? Which one is stronger and why?
Sauron [17]

The EO only gives authority within the executive branch and those federal agencies. The EO doesn't have the legal weight of a law of the land. It can be rescinded by both the president and/or Congress when they provide oversight. A law of the land requires a vote by Congress to be rescinded

 

EXECUTIVE ORDER or EO are exclusively prerogative of the president that do not need the promulgation of congress. The president can issue EO left and right, without the approval of congress because it is exclusively intended for executive branch of the government and not the legislative body like congress. While a law are passed inside the congress for their deliverance and approval.

3 0
3 years ago
A likely reason that government under the Articles of Confederation was difficult was because __________.
Naddik [55]

amendments required a unanimous vote of the states

3 0
3 years ago
For whom did the Populist Party speak?
krek1111 [17]

The Populist Party represented the downtrodden and American against wealthy people.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about the Mali and Songhai empires of the 1300s CE is TRUE? A) They were both Muslim Empires. B) They were both
    15·1 answer
  • Whats is the diference between kaaba and other religiões sites?
    14·1 answer
  • In the United States, most state courts have
    14·2 answers
  • Identify ​two ​reasons why there were more deaths in WWI than in the Napoleonic Wars
    9·1 answer
  • The Spanish Mission system had two main purposes, to convert the native population to Catholicism and to what
    9·1 answer
  • Who was isabella d'Este
    14·2 answers
  • Who excommunicated the bishop of Constantinople in 10547
    6·2 answers
  • Can the Stock Market Crash be an effect of the Treaty of Versailles?
    14·1 answer
  • Which three events led to the American revolution​
    13·1 answer
  • One similarity between Westerns and Street Theatre:
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!