From the given question, we can say that suppression or suspension of the Bill of Rights isn't okay.
Let's look at what the Bill of Rights is all about.
<h3>What is the Bill of Rights?</h3>
As pertaining to the United States, the Bill of Rights is known to be the first ten amendment of the constitution. It's a bill that guarantees the civil rights and liberties to individuals.
In other words, it bestows on the freedom of speech, religion, and press.
If the above is what the Bill of Rights is, then suppressing it is same as suppressing the people.
If the Bill of Rights is suppressed or suspended:
- The federal government will have total power over the people.
- It will weaken the relationship between the government and the people.
- It will expose and endanger the people to rogue politicians.
- The vulnerable people in the society will suffer.
Thus, suppression or suspension of the Bill of Rights isn't okay.
Learn more about Bill of Rights on brainly.com/question/11330436
Answer:
I would say c.
Explanation:
because economic growth is always want big and fast (no pun intended)
Explanation:
The border states in the civil war were the slave states that didn't leave the union.At times he had to resort to force to prevent the border states from joining the Conferdracy
Answer:
The flaws in China’s political system are obvious. The government doesn’t even make a pretense of holding national elections and punishes those who openly call for multiparty rule. The press is heavily censored and the Internet is blocked. Top leaders are unconstrained by the rule of law. Even more worrisome, repression has been ramped up since Xi Jinping took power in 2012, suggesting that the regime is increasingly worried about its legitimacy.
The Democracy Report
Some China experts—most recently David Shambaugh of George Washington University—interpret these ominous signs as evidence that the Chinese political system is on the verge of collapse. But such an outcome is highly unlikely in the near future. The Communist Party is firmly in power, its top leader is popular, and no political alternative currently claims widespread support. And what would happen if the Party’s power did indeed crumble? The most likely result, in my view, would be rule by a populist strongman backed by elements of the country’s security and military forces. The new ruler might seek to buttress his legitimacy by launching military adventures abroad. President Xi would look tame by comparison.
A more realistic and, arguably, desirable outcome would involve political change that builds on the advantages of the current system. But what exactly are the good parts of the Chinese political model? And how can they be advanced without repression? I believe the model can be improved in a more open political environment and, eventually, put before the people in a popular referendum.
