A historian compares the events by period since he compares them by time period
Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.
The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size. Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Answer:C is the answer
Explanation:The empires were replaced by a new culture bending local traditions, Catholicism and spanish rule
<h2>Answer:</h2>
It might make it harder to farm and take care of animals with men off fighting.
Supplies, like food, flour, or candles, might run out.
Fighting might take place in fields, destroying crops.
People might have to do without the things they need.
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The country suffers from war faces lot of issues like ruining of homes and properties, destroy of crops, shortage of supplies like food, flour and other stuff. People might work without the things they require.
The Civil War hit life on the home front as well as the battleground. Families throughout the North and South suffered deficiencies of supplies, had their fields and homes ruined, or in some situations seized to be practiced for the war effort. Work of women and children changed in all aspects. For the first time, many women gained authority of farms or properties, served as nurses on and off the battleground, and even challenged in combat. Families were split separate as loved ones were forwarded off to fight.
He wanted to end discrimination in the workforce and millitary.
