Answer:
The advantage is like the article stated "Over time, J. T. guided Sudhir into a world that few outsiders have ever known,". To put into lamen's terms Sudhir got a inside peek at what most researches look away or far back from a cage of violence, prositution and gangs. The disadvantage can be a ethical, moral case that Sudhir violated. For example, by getting involved in the action of what he was studying, he messed with the research by becoming a recipient in the study and now there's question the validity. He doesn't need to justify because he was a bystander and besides what's the best course of action when two criminal gangs decide to fight each with guns, call the police? When it had to due with beatings although I more of a moral grey area for me based on the fact that I'm just a bistander and there's no guns involved. I think the opposition's main argument is that Sudhir was reckless and he's moral compass is secrewed up
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
It would be to keep people safe
Answer: Both represent backwardness and crisis for a country.
Explanation: A government marked by corruption and anarchy is one that cannot progress. When there is corruption, the country's assets are not distributed equitably, but a small group with power remains with them, leaving the population in need. Corruption is backwardness since the people's money that should be used for the growth of the country is used for other things. When there is anarchy, the nation does not grow since it does not have a power that can direct it in the correct way. The country falls into an imbalance and a crisis may occur.
I believe your answer would be B. prevalence.
Hope this helps,
♥<em>A.W.E.</em><u><em>S.W.A.N.</em></u>♥
