Answer:
They had no rights to vote, they were engaged in various jobs that payed very low, also most women didn't get a education or job training
Explanation:there u go
Answer: The Protector Of The Confederation
Explanation: The Protector Of The Confederation was a hereditary title founded by Napoleon that seceded from the Holy Roman Empire after its dismantling. Essentially it acted as a series of French client states in modern day Germany, in fact Napoleon's conquests where one of the main factors contributing to German Nationalism. Citizens of these newly established client states had one thing in common, that being ethnicity, so most citizens of these new client states felt united in ethnicity and in a resistance to the occupation by the First French Empire.
When the framers designed the US Constitution they did not give the Federal government much power so power was balanced between States and Central Government. But the Federal government has gained more and more power over time. At the same time, the States were restricted over the years, when the Framers did not imagine doing so.
Both of these situations can be good or bad. For example, making the States respect the Bill of Rights was a good thing when individuals had their basic rights stripped on a State level. So making only the Federal government respect the Bill of Rights did not make much sense.
At the same time, the Federal Government has shown much power that was not designed and showed a few issues over the years, especially with the Executive Branch that had in a few opportunities overstepped its powers.
‘Dark age’
Goodjob it was great however I didn’t really study in Middle Ages.
<span>For starters, technology developed and now a lot more people could hear these adresses and see them on TV and hear them through the radio and they could be recorded and studied. The Supreme court decisions were important because they decided what would happen to people and their rights. For example, the supreme court first decided that separate but equal was a good doctrine, but later they decided it was unconstitutional. The addresses could affect public opinion to support something that the congress didn't want, and the supreme court would act on behalf of the people.</span>
