Answer:
The electoral college system was the best solution they chose to democratically elect a president in a way that was both consistent with republican values and with the protections of rights of smaller states.
Explanation:
The Constitution and the new laws in the United States were revolutionary and pioneering by the end of the 18th century. The Founding Fathers could not look at a previous democratic model to find inspiration, because autocracy was the system of government anywhere else. One of the great dilemmas of democracy is how to avoid the tyranny of majorities over minorities. Could they have thought of a better system then? Maybe it was possible in theory, but it was very hard in practice. Besides, the population of the fomer colonies wasn´t as large as it´s today, and there were only 13 states, not 50. They could hardly have envision some outcomes we´ve seen in recent years when some candidates have won the popular vote, but have failed to win key states and electoral votes. They chose what they saw as the best option.
Answer:
I would say that their relationship grew tense over time.
Explanation:
I may not be right on this one, but I'll give it a shot. I say their relationship grew tense as time passed, then became hostile. Native Americans were exposed to their diseases, which caused a huge amount of deaths for the Native Americans. However they still helped them learn how to grow crops to provide for their families. Though the English began to cross boundaries the Natives set while allowing them to reside on their land. The longer the English stayed, the worse they got. The Trail of Tears is a primary example, when colonizers wanted to move west they relocated many Native American's, who didn't want to be 'Americanized' which killed many in the process.
The expression "the long walk" is misleading because, everyone thinks differently a short walk to me might be a long walk to you. So basically because, of perspective.
Answer:
Subsistence agriculture
Explanation:
The Second Agricultural Revolution led to a decrease in subsistence farming rather than an increase.
