1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hatshy [7]
3 years ago
11

Where else is water present on earth

History
1 answer:
Nady [450]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The ocean holds about 97 percent of the Earth's water; the remaining three percent is found in glaciers and ice, below the ground, in rivers and lakes.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In conducting Internet research, which is not a factor in evaluating an online source?
son4ous [18]

Answer:  B. Internet connection speed

Internet speeds vary for many reasons and they won't have an impact on whether a source is credible or not. Instead, you should look at the domain name, the website name, the author, etc to check credibility. You should also get as many sources as you can to back up a claim.

6 0
2 years ago
Susan, an entrepreneur, wants to sell handmade goods from people in developing countries to customers in the United States. Why
Gekata [30.6K]
The correct answer is A.  U.S. dollars would not be useful for people in developing countries to use, but it would still help them and Susan make a profit.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which strategy was used by the United States and other countries to pressure South Africa to end the system of apartheid?
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

military attack was used

3 0
3 years ago
The 1950 Supreme Court decision to ban “separate but equal” law schools in Texas
aliya0001 [1]

The case you describe is:  SWEATT v. PAINTER


Details:

The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).

Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into  the School of Law of the University of Texas.  Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time.  So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.

In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have  lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students.  The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.

In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education.  The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.  In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.  After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.

4 0
3 years ago
Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people
kirza4 [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,

However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."

We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.

Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.

The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What Texas industry most benefited from the energy crisis of the 1970s? A. real estate B. banking C. oil drilling D. agriculture
    6·1 answer
  • In the united states, elections are used to select officeholders. make or ratify legislation. select party nominees. all of the
    9·1 answer
  • How did population growth in the eventually rebellious colonies compare with Englands?
    12·1 answer
  • What change in demographics was observed in developed countries in the twenty-first century? A. falling birth rates but shorter
    11·1 answer
  • During the 1920's, the Ku Klux Klan came to El Paso and impacted the city both financially and educationally. While in control o
    11·1 answer
  • What was the cause and effect of british immigration in Australia
    6·1 answer
  • 22. How did Americans disagree over the role of federal and state governments before and during
    7·2 answers
  • Which of John locke's ideas most directly influenced the decleration of independence
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!! Which group accounted for the smallest percentage of the total population in 2005?
    15·1 answer
  • How are the roles of the vice president in the senate and the speaker of the house similar ?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!