Explanation:
when they answer your question
you are given an option to mark them brainliest
Answer:
Your never going to get that for only 13 points
Explanation:
The question is not a good research question because; it does not specify research criteria.
<h3>Why is the question not a good research question?</h3>
A good research question should meet specific criteria such as the population of interest, be of interest to the scientific community and potentially to the public, possess significant relevance and be compliant with standards.
Read more on research question;
brainly.com/question/25257437
#SPJ1
Answer:
A) Beyond normal almost like a superpower
B)Rainsford is irrational and often makes bad choices
C) Depends cannot see passage, but I think its Zaroff knows Rainford is there
Explanation:
It looks as though this essay should be an argumentative/persuasive essay. As such, there are two main ways to construct this. Knowing you should refute two points from the article, you could do this by either mentioning the opposing viewpoints first then your refutes (known as the block method), or you could do this point by point by stating an opposing viewpoint, then refuting it in the same paragraph (known as the point-by-point method). That said, here are two sample outlines assuming you mention two points:
OUTLINE 1 (Block Method)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-opposing viewpoint 2
Body Paragraph 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
OUTLINE 2 (Point-by-Point)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
Body Paragraph 2
-opposing viewpoint 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
