1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lbvjy [14]
3 years ago
11

According to the article, in 2002, Rhode Island had an advisory referendum on whether citizens favored altering the state consti

tution to make all three branches of government coequal. Voters overwhelming voted yes, but the nonbinding referendum did not force legislators to act one way or the other. In a couple of short paragraphs, explain whether you think this type of referendum is useful and beneficial. What are the benefits of having a direct, binding referendum? What are the drawbacks?
History
1 answer:
RUDIKE [14]3 years ago
4 0

Referendums are elections in which voters do not elect representatives but participate in taking direct participation on some important issue of the country. As advantages, it is highlighted that the Referendum can be used to solve problems of a political nature, or the improvement of the governmental image, when it is too deteriorated in front of the popular collective. Another aspect that touches a possible disadvantage, has to do with the circumstance that can be used as a strategy or political weapon to satisfy political interests or ambitions of power. It has also been argued that this figure has a meaning called "zero sum", that is, where the majority wins everything and the minority loses everything, originating a tyranny of majorities, that have answered one or several questions about a specific issue and that in the case at hand, has to do with the end of the armed conflict, questions that are closed and must be answered with the yes or no.

You might be interested in
What significance does the Holocaust have to current world events?
Bingel [31]

Answer:

One of the perks of being an educator at Holocaust Museum Houston is that thousands of students are touched by the work that we do, and the lessons we teach, each year. One of the downsides is that we only have a short time, with large groups of students, to convey the fundamental importance of this history, and make sure that every student in the room is impacted by what they have learned.  

Unfortunately, perhaps, we do hear all too often from students—as I am sure most history teachers do, that the Holocaust was a long time ago, and it doesn’t matter anymore. Or we hear, “I am not Jewish, so this does matter to me.” And we even have some young people say to us, “This is not my history or my people’s history, so I don’t care.” How wrong they are. History is important because of the roots that it created in societies all over the world. History shows us the paths to new languages, new geographical discoveries, and amendments to government. History also shares with us deeply important lessons that need to be heard and remembered by every single living person.  

The lessons of the Holocaust can be applied universally. This is not just a conversation about the history of the Jewish people, or the history of the Roma people in Germany during World War II. This is not even necessarily a story about World War II. The Holocaust is a deeply personal story about the effect that hatred and prejudice can have on a community. It is a story about millions of people who refused to use their voice to help others, and because of that refusal, millions of people lost their lives for no other reason than the belief that they were an inferior people. Are there any other historical events where we see hatred and prejudice impact communities? Are there current events in the world that share the experience of an apathetic population of people, determined to not get involved? Determined to remain “neutral?” Elie Wiesel once said, “We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.”

One of the key experiences shared by victims of the Holocaust, as well as other genocides and acts of hatred, is the perpetrator’s ability to dehumanize them. Dehumanization is the removal of human dignity, human rights, humanity in its entirety. Dehumanization is key to getting ordinary people to commit acts of violence and mass murder against their community members. This lesson is not exclusive to the Holocaust. Dehumanization, facilitated by the Nuremberg and Berlin Laws, in the Holocaust are just acts of legalized discrimination. In Rwanda, the Hutus called the Tutsis cockroaches and used the media to spread hate speech inspiring violent acts by the community. In Cambodia, people had their autonomy removed by the Khmer Rouge and were placed into a completely new society based on their designated trustworthiness. People being assigned uniforms, numbers, having their heads shaved, and not being allowed to speak their native languages, practice their cultural traditions, or honor their religious beliefs all play into dehumanization. We see dehumanization everywhere.  

The Holocaust matters to us because it is one of the most, if not the most, extensively documented instance of atrocity, hatred, dehumanization, and apathy in world history. The Holocaust also matters because as it was happening, the world stood by and watched—not just Germans, not just Europeans—the world. Today, we use the Holocaust to remember that we, as world citizens, can and must do better.

Explanation:

    im  a nerd with this stuff.  

8 0
3 years ago
The Western Bloc was made up of:
I am Lyosha [343]

Answer:

Democratic and market oriented nations

Explanation:

Apex just did it

8 0
3 years ago
What were the laws that caused the southerne to worry about slavery ending
guajiro [1.7K]
Before Emancipation of slaves in the US many states in the south were afraid to let slaves have freedom because there were all ready a good amount of states to the north that had outlawed slavery. Many people were concerned with the new found freedom of people coming out of slavery. I was not able to find any laws before slaves were freed. I hoped this helped some what.
5 0
3 years ago
Ben Franklin flew his famous kite to test his theory
kolezko [41]
Ben franklin flew his kite to test the theory which was electricity. In 1752 Franklin conducted a experiment in which he used conductive roads to attract lightning to a Leyden jar, an early form of capacitor.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hope that helped ʘ‿ʘ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3 0
3 years ago
Write any five features of the art and culture of Medieval Nepal??<br><br>Please ASAP​
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

The art of Nepal, with a few exceptions, is based on the religious themes taken from Buddhism and Hinduism. Art and ..

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Japanese leaders wished to quickly industrialize in the 1800s because they A. were attempting to eliminate poverty. B. feared en
    14·2 answers
  • In the 1992 national elections, democratic candidate bill clinton
    9·1 answer
  • When did steeplechase become an olympic sport?
    8·1 answer
  • Per capita GDP of a country is the?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Ohio and Michigan have such conflict over their state boundaries
    9·1 answer
  • What did the England want from Asia
    11·1 answer
  • Which best explains why newspapers of the resistance differed from what we know today
    10·1 answer
  • What were the four questions posed by the White Citizens Council to candidates for public office?
    8·1 answer
  • Someone help me with this
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone help me?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!