THIS ISN'T THE ANSWER, only adding on to the question. Excerpt: When I addressed the Congress on the 26th of February last, I thought that it would suffice to assert our neutral rights with arms, our right to use the seas against unlawful interference, our right to keep our people safe against unlawful violence. But armed neutrality, it now appears, is impracticable. Because submarines are in effect outlaws when used as the German submarines have been used against merchant shipping, it is impossible to defend ships against their attacks as the law of nations has assumed that merchantmen would defend themselves against privateers or cruisers, visible craft giving chase upon the open sea.
It is common prudence in such circumstances, grim necessity indeed, to endeavor to destroy them before they have shown their own intention. They must be dealt with upon sight, if dealt with at all. The German government denies the right of neutrals to use arms at all within the areas of the sea which it has proscribed, even in the defense of rights which no modern publicist has ever before questioned their right to defend. The intimation is conveyed that the armed guards which we have placed on our merchant ships will be treated as beyond the pale of law and subject to be dealt with as pirates would be.
Armed neutrality is ineffectual enough at best; in such circumstances and in the face of such pretensions it is worse than ineffectual: it is likely only to produce what it was meant to prevent; it is practically certain to draw us into the war without either the rights or the effectiveness of belligerents. There is one choice we cannot make, we are incapable of making: we will not choose the path of submission and suffer the most sacred rights of our nation and our people to be ignored or violated. The wrongs against which we now array ourselves are no common wrongs; they cut to the very roots of human life.
Answer: *blank* is one of the best people I've ever met. *blank is hardworking, talented, and truly genuine. I met blank in middle school. We clicked instantly after realizing we had similar interests. We both liked blank, blank, and even blank. Blank was there for me and I was there for blank. Blank doesnt hold back, and will always tell me what I really need to hear. I really admire Blank.
The loss of innocence is represented by the character of Liesel who was forced into a more mature and adult role by each tragedy she overcame. However, because of her loss of innocence, is that she found a lifelong friend in Max, the Jewish boy who was hiding in her house. For this reason we can say that Zusak's message is that even though the tragedies of life might take our innocence away, we can overcome and empathize with other people.
Quotes:
"Like most misery, it started with apparent happiness"
" Even death has a heart"
"A DEFINITION NOT FOUND
IN THE DICTIONARY
Not leaving: an act of trust and love,
often deciphered by children"
