Answer:
I believe the first answer is probably 'the robber' or the 'robber in the flood' or something to that effect.
It is possible; they do this by interpreting the information differently, and putting their own spin on the story.
It's important because some articles could be incorrect, others biased, and still others who twist the facts.
When we present the pure facts we can write without bias. (things like 'two men robbed $1,000 from a convenience store last night.' v.s. 'two imposing masked men broke into a family-owned, hard-working shop last night, leaving them penniless and in denial.' Obviously, the 2nd is the attention grabber, and would be the news headline, not the 1st. To work against your own biases, you must be careful to only present facts with NO assumptions: e.g. 'well they were robbed, so obviously they have to be upset.' if they didn't directly say they were upset, it's not a fact, even if they look upset.
When you present assumptions as facts, and when people find out they were not true facts, you loose your credibility in the eyes of the people; even if from now on you only present true facts, nobody will believe you're not twisting it anymore. *NOTE your curriculum may have an opinion on this, and if they do it is most likely the correct answer on your test will be 'no'.
Explanation:
