Answer:
I think that there was a sort of half and half thing going on. Okay so first, there might have been an emperor who ruled which was actually not uncommon for china at that time but then there was also communist ideals so the government might have also been communist or growing into that phase but still a mix of both. I think they had a traditional command economy because the economy was comandeered by the emperor himself because he was at the center of everything. Some of the government policies that were implemented on the people of China in this movie were that people had certain curfews which were seen throughout the movie because at night everything was shut down or closed. I couldn't really find much else so I can't answer that question thoroughly. I am also taking all this information from the original Mulan because the new Mulan is somewhat different
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
