1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uranmaximum [27]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following best describes serfs?

History
2 answers:
Ede4ka [16]3 years ago
4 0
_Brainliest if helped!!

I believe its A. <span>peasants who gave their land to the local lords in exchange for protection

Serfs who has the land will work for the local lords (on the land(s)) to get  protection and usage rights</span>
Sveta_85 [38]3 years ago
3 0

Correct answer is: C. The lowest-level vassal in a feudal system.

Under Feudalism, there was a peasant status called Serfdom.  Serfs were bound and tied to the land, if sold they came with it. It was not slavery itself, but under the feudalism they were definitely the lowest form of "tenant" of the land.

You might be interested in
What is one way that City landscape changed in the beginning of the twentieth century
Karolina [17]
Due to the Industrial Revolution, the once lush and bountiful grasslands and forests were replaced by urban areas (cities).
3 0
3 years ago
The ----- had established a temporary government only 3 days earlier
Makovka662 [10]

the duma...................

3 0
3 years ago
"Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" natural is used to describe people who?
IRINA_888 [86]
'have not been touched by the spirit of God'
7 0
3 years ago
Help please it would mean alot :))
erik [133]

Answer: many people in georgia  belong to an eastern   orthdox            

church

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is the most important reason for the end of the (western) roman empire? and what is the least important reason for the end
dsp73
The most important reason for the collapse of Rome was the failure to actually integrate what they conquered. When Roman soldiers conquered new lands, it was rare that they ever attempted to force their culture, ideals, or laws upon the natives and barbarians. Thus, when the Empire began suffering internal struggles, the natives they had conquered decided to take action, which lead to the swift collapse by barbarian invasion from all sides. It's hard to pick a LEAST important reason, seeing that there were many of them, but I suppose a contender would most likely be the common refusal of the Empire to even acknowledge that barbarians were rising. On the outer edges of their territory, in places like Gaul and Morocco, the Roman government was reluctant to even recognize the threat of the barbarians, thinking that even accepting that these barbarians were causing trouble would weaken their prestige in the public eye.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which term refers to powers that are not written in the constitution but may be assumed from the expressed powers?
    14·2 answers
  • How did the power structure of medieval towns shift as their populations grew?​
    15·1 answer
  • which of the following best describes how the boundaries of the United States change between 1812 and 1821
    5·1 answer
  • HELP HELP HELP PLEASE
    7·1 answer
  • 36. What country sent Vespucci on a voyage to South America?
    8·2 answers
  • Who determines prices in socialism?
    10·1 answer
  • What was America's 'Cold War culture'?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was Rome forced to make peace with Macedonia during the First Macedonian War?
    15·2 answers
  • Do you think RamsesII is more of a myth or still a real historical figure?
    11·1 answer
  • *PLEASE RESPOND FASTTTTTT*
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!