Answer:
====================================================
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is missing the attached figure.
The edge of each cube used to build this rectangular prism is 1/3 inch long. Based on the attached figure.
the volume of the prism = length × height × width
length = 
height =
width = 
So the volume of the prism = 
∴ The equation that shows the volume of the prism, in cubic inches
=
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide the US population by the world population:
328,200,000/7,674,000,000 = 0.0428
Multiply 0.0428 with 100:
0.0428 x 100 = 4.28
Approximately 4 out of 100 people in the world would live in the USA.
Answer:
b. Hannah is likely to be incorrect because 9 is not contained in the interval.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
Hannah estimated per CI the difference between the average time that people spend outside in southern states and the average time people spend outside in northern states.
The CI is a method of estimation of population parameters that propose a range of possible values for them. The confidence level you use to construct the interval can be interpreted as, if you were to calculate 100 confidence interval, you'd expect that 99 of them will contain the true value of the parameter of interest.
In this example, the 99%CI resulted [0.4;8.0]hs
Meaning that with a 99% confidence level you'd expect the value of the difference between the average time people from southern states spend outside than the average time people from northern states spend outside is included in the interval [0.4;8.0]hs.
Now, she claims that people living in southern states spend 9 more hours outside than people living in northern states, symbolized μ₁ - μ₂ > 9
Keep in mind that if you were to test her claim, the resulting hypothesis test would be one-tailed
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ ≤ 9
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ > 9
And that the calculated Ci is tow-tailed, so it is not valid to use it to decide over the hypotheses pair. This said, considering that the calculated interval doesn't contain 9, it is most likely that Hannah's claim is incorrect.
I hope this helps!
The answer is <span>2(–4y + 13) – 3y = –29
Step 1: Express </span><span>x from the second equation
Step 2: Substitute x into the first equation:
The system of equations is:
</span><span>2x – 3y = –29
x + 4y = 13
Step 1:
</span>The second equation is: x + 4y = 13
Rearrange it to get x: x = - 4y + 13
Step 2:
The first equation is: 2x – 3y = –29
The second equation is: x = - 4y + 13
Substitute x from the second equation into the first one:
2(-4y + 13) - 3y = -29
Therefore, the second choice is correct.
