I’d say some countries had an easier time with shifting independence because of who was at the helm of there leadership and what advantages they were given weather it comes to land, trade or power overall. In Africa it would’ve been much harder to obtain political stability for new countries because of the colonization that had hurt many African countries and had made them give up many young people and loose many smart individual minds that could lead there country. It honestly depends on the circumstances that many leaders were put into mamut leaders from impoverished nations couldn’t really control what they were given and couldn’t do much with what to fix because of the amount that was taken from them, while leaders in rich countries would be able to have more control and power to work with so the more resources you have the more the leader can actually begin to do activities that can either help or hurt there country depending on what there type of government is.
Answer:
C. Confederal
Explanation:
Confederal: “Many Different Chairs” The confederal form of government is an association of independent states. The central government gets its authority from the independent states. Power rests in each individual state, whose representatives meet to address the needs of the group.
The answer is: Some questioned the war and Lincoln's leadership.
When the northern states battled the southern states in the civil war, the northern states have larger number of soldiers and more advanced weapons due to early industrialization.
Because of this, the northern citizens supported the cause with full confidence. After hearing that they manage to lost despite having the advantage, some questioned the war and lincoln's leadership.
The house of representatives
