The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The economic and political conditions that had to exist for President Taft's "Dollar Diplomacy" to be effective were the following.
There had to be a special United States interest in strategic decisions that could affect the economic and political interest of the United States in the region.
For instance, that was the case of the money Central American countries such as Nicaragua owned to European nations. Taft decided to pay that debt but the result was that Nicaragua was in deep debt to the United States, and other kinds of problems aroused.
The foreign policy of "Dollar Diplomacy" was not so effective. It did not pressure countries through a military threat but it created severe differences between the US and Latin America.
I'm assuming you mean the French alliance with the American colonists during the American War for Independence against the British.
The French alliance was hugely important for two reasons:
- France provided significant military support, especially in leadership roles like that of General Lafayette, and in support provided by the French navy in battling British ships and transporting reinforcements for the American patriots.
- France devoted enormous financial aid to the Americans. The cost to France for supporting America’s revolution added up to 1 billion livres (about 4 billion in today’s dollars). That financial boost was much needed by the revolutionaries in America. [It did also have the side effect of putting the French government deeper in debt, which led to the French Revolution.]
Answer:
in 1453 sultan mehmed II of the ottoman empire conquered the Byzantine empire
I'd say B, because the armada was disrupted. No ships were burnt, but they were broken apart, meaning none returned. I hope this helps!
The answer is C good luck on your assignment!
