This is how I would go: (I'm just glossing over it, sorry if you think it lacks detail. :L)
<span>1. California does not deserve a seat in the United Nations. </span>
<span>2. The UN is only for nations; people in California are US citizens; they do not have a culture nor a culture that is exclusive to the rest of the US. In this sense, California is not a nation. (this is the definition of a nation bit.) </span>
<span>3. Federalism, the system where states and national governments share power. California (states in general) does not have the power to enter into treaties with foreign countries, nor regulate commerce with foreign countries. These powers are exclusive to the national government. This would mean that it cannot be given a seat, where these powers would be put into California's hands. I guess states governments would also fit into here somewhere. </span>
The answer is B. cuz it's talking about the state population and where the senate sits at.
Answer:
The first argument.
Explanation:
Because America wanted to stop communism from spreading into the Western hemisphere to curtail soviet influence there.
Answer:
That he had refused to pass certain laws that would benefit the citizens of the colonies.
Explanation:
Original line from the Declaration: "<em>He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.</em>"
Yes it helped them economically. England could get raw materials from the colonies as well as things like rum that could be produced in the colonies.
