Reread page 2, paragraph 9 of “This Teen Fought for Your Rights”. Make an inference surrounding the meaning of each of the three
phrases below within the paragraph of the text. Construct a short answer response that conveys how these phrases support the overall theme of the passage. Include evidence from the text to support your answer. Answer all parts of the question. This is the paragraph that evidence can be used from : "I was so happy and surprised that we won," says Tinker. "I didn't think there was any chance that these important judges--adults--would think that kids have rights." The Court's ruling gives students free-speech rights at school--but only up to a point. The justices said that school officials must balance kids' First Amendment rights with the need to maintain order. As long as an act of expression doesn't cause a "substantial disruption" or invade the rights of others, it's allowed. For example, the courts have since relied on the Tinker ruling to allow students to have nose rings and dyed hair but not to wear Confederate flag T-shirts in the classroom, because doing so might be disruptive. Maintain order “substantial disruption”
It is false that reading a play rather than seeing it takes away all of its entertainment value. Both reading and seeing a play can be very entertaining, it has nothing to do with the medium.
