1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mojhsa [17]
3 years ago
10

How did Nebuchadnezzar make babylonia the leading state in western asia?

History
1 answer:
Blizzard [7]3 years ago
6 0

Nebuchadnezzar (the king of Babylonia) after the fall of the Assyrian empire make Babylonia the leading state in Western Asia by creating it as the center of the empire. He gave Babylonia the status as one of the great cities of the world.  He founded a city which was not only wondrous but also a center of intellectual pursuits and arts.

You might be interested in
Which two civilizations had such a great influence on later cultures that they were called the mother cultures
Dennis_Churaev [7]

The Olmec and the Zapotec are the mother cultures.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When early colonists arrived in the New World, some people chose to look for gold instead of helping to plant food. What were th
Digiron [165]
I had this part of history earlier this year and I think the answer is A. They searched for gold and in the time they were doing that they were risking being able to eat. But if you look later it might affect the life of their children which partial makes it point D.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When managers of Ford's Theater learned Lincoln would be attending the
Alja [10]

They had cleared out the balcony for the President.

Explanation:

When the theater had found that Lincoln would be attending there was not much that they could do as they had little time.

So they allowed for the balcony to be cleared first of all for his personal use only and for providing the space for his bodyguards there.

However, this would not prove to be enough as he would be eventually assassinated in that space only and it could have been harder for the man to do it in some place else.

3 0
3 years ago
Who conquered the mongol empire
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

Genghis khan

Explanation:

By 1206, Genghis Khan had conquered all Mongol and Turkic tribes in Mongolia and southern Siberia.

5 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following are negative characteristics of political conventions? Select all that apply.
    8·2 answers
  • What is a quaker and what impact did this group have on the establishment of Pennsylvania
    9·1 answer
  • The diplomatic tension between the united states and the soviet union was known as _______.
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the united states drop a second atomic bomb on japan? answers?
    10·2 answers
  • What instrument of the Roman Republic was generally considered to be the MOST powerful and prestigious?
    9·2 answers
  • According to the picture above, who was most afraid of joining the League of Nations, and therefore, refusing to approve our ent
    13·1 answer
  • Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the
    13·2 answers
  • What is the major difference between socialism and fascism?
    5·1 answer
  • 50 points!
    5·1 answer
  • Background information about what political role did women play in the transformation of south Africa from 1990.​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!