Answer:
log[3(x+4)] is equal to log(3) + log(x + 4), which corresponds to choice number three.
Step-by-step explanation:
By the logarithm product rule, for two nonzero numbers 
and 
,
.
Keep in mind that a logarithm can be split into two only if the logarithm contains the product or quotient of two numbers.
For example, 
is the number in the logarithm ![\log{[3(x + 4)]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Clog%7B%5B3%28x%20%2B%204%29%5D%7D)
. Since is a product of the two numbers 
and 
, the logarithm can be split into two. By the logarithm product rule,
![\log{[3(x + 4)]} = \log{(3)} + \log{(x + 4)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Clog%7B%5B3%28x%20%2B%204%29%5D%7D%20%3D%20%5Clog%7B%283%29%7D%20%2B%20%5Clog%7B%28x%20%2B%204%29%7D)
.
However, 
cannot be split into two since the number inside of it is a sum rather than a product. Hence choice number three is the answer to this question.
I believe it’s D I’m not 100 percent sure tho
The first one cuz if u put it and draw it on a number line and make sense out of it you will see the first one makes sense
While Gary is using an indirect method to prove that segment DE is not parallel to segment BC in the triangle ABC shown ( I attached below the picture that should have support your question). And If he starts with the assumption that segment DE is parallel to segment BC I am pretty sure that <span>inequality which he will use to contradict the assumption is the first option : </span><span>
4:10 ≠ 6:14</span>
Just isolate the y in both cases:
4y=-3+2x, y=-3/4+1/2x
-2y=-3x+4, y=3/2x-2
