1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jek_recluse [69]
3 years ago
7

Mengapa british tidak memberi masa yang cukup untuk sultan meneliti perjanjian ?

History
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

They wanted to take over the Ottoman empire.

Explanation:

( tranlated in english)

Why did the British not give enough time for the sultan to examine the treaty?

(oringial)

Mengapa british tidak memberi masa yang cukup untuk sultan meneliti perjanjian ?

You might be interested in
Describe the course of bantu migration​
motikmotik

Answer:

Explanation:

The migration of the Bantu people from their origins in southern West Africa saw a gradual population movement sweep through the central, eastern, and southern parts of the continent starting in the mid-2nd millennium BCE and finally ending before 1500 CE.

BRAINLIEST PLS

5 0
3 years ago
How many words are in the oath of office that a new u.s. president takes on inauguration day?
Mariana [72]
35 Words a president has to take.
3 0
3 years ago
A set of written directions that tell a bank how to use money to pay someone is called a
madam [21]
A check is a set of written direction which tells a financial institution or a bank how to use the money for paying someone. That someone is the person who the issuer of check owes the money. The issuer of the check will be the one who is responsible in paying the financial institution or the bank with the amount of money stated on the check. The check also serves as good as cash or it can also be a post cash payment to someone. It can also be served as a collateral to someone's liability. 
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which type of government did the Federalist believe?
Sonja [21]

Your answer is D.. I hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the ________ vote to win the ___
Softa [21]

Answer:

The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the popular vote to win the electoral vote, and a strong third-party candidate could win enough electoral votes to prevent either major-party candidate from receiving a majority of votes.

Explanation:

Most critics against the Electoral College state as one of their primary reasons the idea of the winner-take-all system allowing a candidate who has lost the popular vote to still win the electoral vote. Furthermore, they claim that a powerful third-party candidate could not only pull votes away from the major candidates but also bargain their way into the Electoral College.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country abolished the slave trade three weeks after the us congress an act prohibiting importation of slaves into anywhere
    13·2 answers
  • How women in Rome gained more rights
    9·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Homestead Act?
    7·1 answer
  • What did alexander the great's generals want him to do
    10·2 answers
  • What kind of architecture and urban planning were developed in early civilizations?
    7·1 answer
  • In October of 1973, war broke out during the Jewish Holy Days of Yom Kippur. Who supported the differing sides? The Soviets supp
    8·2 answers
  • Do you agree or disagree w/ Cortes decision to burn the ships? Explain
    15·2 answers
  • Which type of government is illustrated in this graphic?
    11·1 answer
  • Help.
    14·1 answer
  • If u get this 2 right I’ll give brainliest!!
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!