It is necessary because if you don't have a confirmed opinion with textual evidence to back it up you wont have a good argument.
Enter more information so we can help
Answer:
You don't have to be French to enjoy a decent red wine," Charles Jousselin de Gruse used to tell his foreign guests whenever he entertained them in Paris. "But you do have to be French to recognize one," he would add with a laugh.
After a lifetime in the French diplomatic corps, the Count de Gruse lived with his wife in an elegant townhouse on Quai Voltaire. He was a likeable man, cultivated of course, with a well-deserved reputation as a generous host and an amusing raconteur.
This evening's guests were all European and all equally convinced that immigration was at the root of Europe's problems. Charles de Gruse said nothing. He had always concealed his contempt for such ideas. And, in any case, he had never much cared for these particular guests.
Explanation:
Answer:
It was intended as a warning about tendencies within liberal democracies, and that is how it has been read. The postwar Sovietization of Eastern Europe produced societies right out of Orwell's pages, but American readers responded to “1984” as a book about loyalty oaths and McCarthyism.
Explanation:
- Eijiro <3
Well, the answer is definitely C - modernization. The traditional society refused to modernize in any way, but with the development of technology and the inevitable era of industrialized society, they had no choice but to modernize.