I think the civil rights act of 1964
A representative democracy is similar to a constitutional monarchy because power in both governments is limited.
A representative democracy is when the people are allowed to vote for their leaders to serve for them in the government such as electing the President. A constitutional monarchy is when a monarch is held back by the law and Parliament.
Answer:
The main reason the colonists were angry, historians say, was because Britain had rejected the concept of 'no taxation without representation.' At that time, almost no colonists chose to be independent of Britain. But all of them, as British citizens, respected their rights and the principle of local self-rule.
Explanation:
United States control of Puerto Rico’s government with Puerto Ricans
becoming U.S. citizens after 1917; the Philippines providing a naval
base to guard U.S. trade in Asia, which in turn provided some
improvement in Filipino schools, roads, and healthcare.
The importance is that for the first time in history, a national constitution explicitly stated that it had been drafted not by a monarch or a group of barons but by representatives of ordinary citizens. It expressed the fact that such government had been instituted by the democratic will of the people and not by the “divine right” of a monarch or ruler.
It is definitely a collective term; it puts forward the right of self-government of the national community. It does not express the ruling will of an individual person but the collective will of an entire nation.
